Please reconsider providing a public -dev package again. For applications that want to know information about CPUs, the only alternative is using libcpufreq. However that library is abandoned both upstream and in Debian, and recently I have seen it returning junk data.
Hi again Juerg and all,
I want to mention that upstream Linux developers actually *do* care about ABI stability.
For example, one of the commits broke ABI but it was quickly reverted and then fixed in a way that does not change the ABI:
https:/ /git.kernel. org/pub/ scm/linux/ kernel/ git/torvalds/ linux.git/ commit/ ?id=41ddb7e1f79 693d9
Please reconsider providing a public -dev package again. For applications that want to know information about CPUs, the only alternative is using libcpufreq. However that library is abandoned both upstream and in Debian, and recently I have seen it returning junk data.
The affected applications are:
$ reverse-depends -b libcpufreq-dev -r focal Build-Depends plugin
Reverse-
* cpufreqd
* gkrellm2-cpufreq
* gnome-applets
* mate-applets
* xfce4-cpufreq-