Cannot install fonts using method described in help

Correction:

I Googled for how to actually install fonts. I followed the instructions I found and opened up ~/.fonts/ and discovered that the font had, in fact, been installed. However:

1. It hadn't been installed to the place I had put it (the fonts:/// window),
2. the fonts:/// window hadn't indicated that the font had been installed by including it in the list of fonts,
3. no message had been displayed to indicate that the font had been diverted elsewhere, and
4. no message had been displayed when I tried repeating the drag-drop, which presumably silently overwrote the copy in ~/.fonts/ each time.

Thank you for your bug. That's known upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319512

As of Hardy, fonts get installed simply by putting them in ~/.fonts, nautilus or no nautilus.

The fonts:/// pseudo-directory does not work any longer and does not need to.

Is this Invalid then, since Edgy is no longer supported and this scheme no longer exists? Or is still valid for Dapper/Feisty/Gutsy?

the bug is obsolete in hardy and intrepid

The bug is present in Hardy. There is no link to fonts directory in System / Preferences / Appearance -> Fonts tab

there is no fonts special location in hardy

There's still the issue that if you use the help system you get directed to fonts:/// (if the help browser doesn't just crash that is).

I guess this should be filed as bug of the help system/content.

This will be fixed in Karmic. "Install Font" option will be provided in the preview window as well as in the right-click menu.

The font issue and other could be fixed with nautilus actions

i mean:

Set as Wallpapaer, Install Font, Open as Administrator, Send shortcut, etc.

This bug will be fixed in Gnome 2.28.
See http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2009/07/26/re-adding-fonts-in-gnome/

Related/duplicate bugs: Bug #254056 Bug #389657

Also see upstream bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407605

I never understood why the abstraction of fonts:/// was removed. I enjoyed the concept and though it was easier than showing and navigating through hidden folders. Since this bug is from 2007 I'm not sure if the reporter is requesting to bring back the fonts:/// abstraction or if he is reporting to edit the documentation.

Mat has proposed that in karmic you can right click a .ttf file and it will propose to install the font. How does this scale on multiple .ttf files or folders/sub-folders full of fonts?