Ubuntu
brasero package

brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_instance_get_private()

Bug #742930 reported by xandox
20
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
brasero (Ubuntu)
New
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: brasero

just try create iso image

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: brasero 2.32.1-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.38-generic 2.6.38
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Mar 26 08:41:00 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/brasero
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101008.1)
ProcCmdline: brasero
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 LANG=ru_RU.utf8
 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f7a93b75d01 <g_type_instance_get_private+33>: cmpq $0x0,(%rdi)
 PC (0x7f7a93b75d01) ok
 source "$0x0" ok
 destination "(%rdi)" (0x4d8d604a) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: brasero
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_instance_get_private () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 unique_marshal_ENUM__INT_BOXED_UINT () from /usr/lib/libunique-1.0.so.0
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_instance_get_private()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-25 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
xandox (iarzhannikov) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote :

StacktraceTop:
 g_type_instance_get_private (instance=0x4d8d604a, private_type=16861184) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.4/./gobject/gtype.c:4503
 brasero_app_unique_message (uapp=<value optimized out>, command=-1, message_data=<value optimized out>, app=0x4d8d604a) at brasero-app.c:2015
 unique_marshal_ENUM__INT_BOXED_UINT (closure=0xf8ba80, return_value=0x7fffaf73c0c0, n_param_values=<value optimized out>, param_values=0x138d000, invocation_hint=<value optimized out>, marshal_data=<value optimized out>) at uniquemarshal.c:85
 g_closure_invoke (closure=0xf8ba80, return_value=0x7fffaf73c0c0, n_param_values=4, param_values=0x138d000, invocation_hint=0x7fffaf73c080) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.4/./gobject/gclosure.c:767
 signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=<value optimized out>, detail=0, instance=0xd99940, emission_return=0x7fffaf73c230, instance_and_params=0x138d000) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.4/./gobject/gsignal.c:3252

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stacktrace.txt
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : ThreadStacktrace.txt
Changed in brasero (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Sebastien Bacher (seb128)
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Eliah Kagan (degeneracypressure) wrote :

This looks to me like a duplicate of bug 653630 (compare stack traces, and especially compare the "Apport retracing service" trace here with the corresponding trace in another duplicate of that bug, bug 685061).

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.