Sadly the company decided to move out from pulse secure usage, so I can't help anymore with tests. But I can give some insights.
The main issue is that AVAHI_DAEMON_DETECT_LOCAL set as 0 isn't avoiding avahi to change routes. It shouldn't happen.
My patch isn't this direction and it is much more specific for the use case I had that time. My suggestion for long term solution instead is to just call `return` or `exit 0` once the AVAHI_DAEMON_DETECT_LOCAL value is 0.
Hi @dbungert,
Sadly the company decided to move out from pulse secure usage, so I can't help anymore with tests. But I can give some insights.
The main issue is that AVAHI_DAEMON_ DETECT_ LOCAL set as 0 isn't avoiding avahi to change routes. It shouldn't happen.
My patch isn't this direction and it is much more specific for the use case I had that time. My suggestion for long term solution instead is to just call `return` or `exit 0` once the AVAHI_DAEMON_ DETECT_ LOCAL value is 0.
What do you think?