adobe-flashplugin installs without license agreement

Bug #1132690 reported by Diggory
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This is a policy issue more than anything else: the plugin installs without requiring the user to accept the "Adobe Flash Player End User License Agreement". I know this because I have not accepted this licence on this installation of Ubuntu, because I do not wish to use it (and was surprised to find it being installed (as a dependency) without my agreement).

I don't know what's going on here, but I don't think software requiring accepting the terms of an EULA should be installed without explicit user consent.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Letzeisen (dtl131) wrote :

Downloading the plugin implies agreement to the EULA. The EULA is on the adobe website and this is noted in the package description.

What package did you install that also installed flash? ubuntu restricted extras?

Revision history for this message
Diggory (diggory-hardy) wrote :

On the Adobe website this is an obvious step: click the respective button. In the case of a package which can be installed automatically as a dependency there is no such obvious step to accept the EULA (I wouldn't have even known the package was being installed had I not spotted it downloading). In my case the primary package I installed was Opera, but I don't consider that relevant.

It's not really my place to say, but I would suggest some kind of prompt at installation time (like Debian does on some packages) may be the best solution, or alternatively only enabling the respective repository after prompting the user on the EULA, or some such.

For what its worth, my real gripe is that I prefer to choose on a case-by-case basis which non-free (by DFSG terms) software I install, and since I had chosen not to install Adobe flash I was not happy about it being installed behind-my-back, so to speak. However accepting or not accepting Adobe's EULA is a close enough proxy that it doesn't seem worth worrying about the difference.

Revision history for this message
Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote :

This would be inconsistent with all the other non-free packages in the partner repo or in multiverse which don't display the license at install time. I don't think relying on the fact that the license is displayed in this one particular case is significant.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Letzeisen (dtl131) wrote :

Debian does have some prompts for things like Java and Microsoft fonts, but not for the flashplugin-nonfree package (I run Debian sid and I just tested it by uninstalling/reinstalling Flash). So actually, I think the issue is more with the Opera packaging pulling Flash.

Revision history for this message
Diggory (diggory-hardy) wrote :

I disagree that dependency handling is to blame, but that's just my 2¢. No idea about the other packages, but agree that handling things uniformly makes sense.

By the way you may have misjudged the flashplugin-nonfree package: from what I remember, it doesn't install flash directly, but has to be run from the command-line to do so, and it probably asks the licence then.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Letzeisen (dtl131) wrote :

Yes, I removed the package, reinstalled it, used the update commmand to install/uninstall the plugin, etc. and I didn't get a forced prompt. Maybe that's because Adobe doesn't require the user to explicitly agree to the EULA when downloading.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.