Al 03/12/12 11:34, En/na Michael Nelson ha escrit:
> Hi David,
>
> This seems not to be a bug, but re-open if you find otherwise. The issue
> afaics is that it's published in extras with the package name 'postman-
> image-uploader' (correct), but sca/devportal has been told the package
> name is 'postman' (wrong, but it may have been uploaded to a PPA with
> that name in the past?).
Thanks for looking into this Michael. What happened was the following:
1. The 'postman' package was uploaded to extras
2. Afterwards we noticed its name conflicted with the existing 'postman'
package in the main archive
3. The extras 'postman' package was removed
4. The new extras 'postman-image-uploader' was uploaded
5. I contacted Anthony to fix the data in myapps
6. A webops fixed the data
7. I double-checked that the precise and quantal 'postman' packages were
no longer in myapps
You can see this in the exported data from sca
> [1] which is imported into apps.ubuntu.com with the wrong packagename
> but the correct icon/screenshot [2].
>
> It is not obvious from the devportal entry that this is the case, as it
> is not yet displaying the uploaded package name, but it will be
> displayed once the fix for bug 1084180 is deployed. Anthony should be
> able to fix this data issue quite simply in the /admin/ UI (the other
> option being to re-review the app, setting the correct package name).
>
Thanks! We'll wait for Anthony to fix the data in the admin UI, as it is
not possible to re-review already published apps, as far as I can tell.
However, I'm not too sure this bug is invalid, as I can see several
other entries without icon right now:
Al 03/12/12 11:34, En/na Michael Nelson ha escrit:
> Hi David,
>
> This seems not to be a bug, but re-open if you find otherwise. The issue
> afaics is that it's published in extras with the package name 'postman-
> image-uploader' (correct), but sca/devportal has been told the package
> name is 'postman' (wrong, but it may have been uploaded to a PPA with
> that name in the past?).
Thanks for looking into this Michael. What happened was the following:
1. The 'postman' package was uploaded to extras image-uploader' was uploaded
2. Afterwards we noticed its name conflicted with the existing 'postman'
package in the main archive
3. The extras 'postman' package was removed
4. The new extras 'postman-
5. I contacted Anthony to fix the data in myapps
6. A webops fixed the data
7. I double-checked that the precise and quantal 'postman' packages were
no longer in myapps
However, it seems that the Precise entry is back:
https:/ /apps.ubuntu. com/cat/ applications/ precise/ postman/
You can see this in the exported data from sca
> [1] which is imported into apps.ubuntu.com with the wrong packagename
> but the correct icon/screenshot [2].
>
> It is not obvious from the devportal entry that this is the case, as it
> is not yet displaying the uploaded package name, but it will be
> displayed once the fix for bug 1084180 is deployed. Anthony should be
> able to fix this data issue quite simply in the /admin/ UI (the other
> option being to re-review the app, setting the correct package name).
>
Thanks! We'll wait for Anthony to fix the data in the admin UI, as it is
not possible to re-review already published apps, as far as I can tell.
However, I'm not too sure this bug is invalid, as I can see several
other entries without icon right now:
https:/ /apps.ubuntu. com/cat/ applications/ unity-lens- vm/ /apps.ubuntu. com/cat/ applications/ cuckoo/ /apps.ubuntu. com/cat/ applications/ unity-lens- github/
https:/
https:/
> [1] http:// software- center. ubuntu. com/api/ 2.0/application s/en/ubuntu/ precise/ i386/ /apps.ubuntu. com/cat/ applications/ postman/
> [2] https:/
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu-webcatalog
> Status: New => Invalid
>
-- la.wordpress. com ca/dplanella / www.twitter. com/dplanella
David Planella
Ubuntu Translations Coordinator
www.ubuntu.com / www.davidplanel
www.identi.