Security bugs should not be classified as 'sru'
Bug #962890 reported by
Daniel Holbach
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ubuntu-sponsoring |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Feedback from Bryce:
On http://
Should security bugs should be listed as type 'sru' in the sponsoring report? I'm wondering maybe not?
Possibly security bugs should be excluded entirely from the report? Possibly I haven't had enough experience with them, but I'm not sure I have the right access to process them?
To post a comment you must log in.
I agree about not classifying them as 'sru', but AFAIK the security team uses this overview for their sponsoring as well and I'm not sure if they should have to have their own sponsorship overview. I don't know - maybe we could have a separate table? Any thoughts on this?