2020-04-13 03:06:05 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2020-04-13 03:06:28 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
|
4.15 aws sru-20200406 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2020-04-13 03:07:04 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
description |
Issue found on i3.metal and c5.metal, passed on r5.metal and other instances
Test failed with:
tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: clock_nanosleep() slept for too long
startup='Sun Apr 12 19:33:14 2020'
tst_test.c:1241: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
tst_timer_test.c:348: INFO: CLOCK_MONOTONIC resolution 1ns
tst_timer_test.c:360: INFO: prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) = 50us
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 1000us 500 iterations, threshold 450.01us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 1063us, max 1084us, median 1067us, trunc mean 1066.81us (discarded 25)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 2000us 500 iterations, threshold 450.01us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 2071us, max 2078us, median 2077us, trunc mean 2076.76us (discarded 25)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 5000us 300 iterations, threshold 450.04us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 5066us, max 5108us, median 5106us, trunc mean 5103.24us (discarded 15)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 10000us 100 iterations, threshold 450.33us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 10132us, max 10147us, median 10135us, trunc mean 10138.91us (discarded 5)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 25000us 50 iterations, threshold 451.29us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 25221us, max 25258us, median 25233us, trunc mean 25239.48us (discarded 2)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 100000us 10 iterations, threshold 537.00us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 100215us, max 100773us, median 100684us, trunc mean 100638.44us (discarded 1)
tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: clock_nanosleep() slept for too long
Time: us | Frequency
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100215 | ***********-
100245 |
100275 |
100305 |
100335 |
100365 |
100395 |
100425 |
100455 |
100485 |
100515 |
100545 |
100575 |
100605 |
100635 |
100665 | ********************************************************************
100695 | ***********-
100725 | ***********-
100755 | ***********-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30us | 1 sample = 11.33333 '*', 22.66667 '+', 45.33333 '-', non-zero '.'
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 1000000us 2 iterations, threshold 4400.00us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 1003376us, max 1005030us, median 1003376us, trunc mean 1003376.00us (discarded 1)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
Summary:
passed 6
failed 1
skipped 0
warnings 0 |
Issue found on i3.metal and c5.metal amd64 instances with aws 4.15.0-1066.70~16.04.1, passed on r5.metal and other instances
Test failed with:
tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: clock_nanosleep() slept for too long
startup='Sun Apr 12 19:33:14 2020'
tst_test.c:1241: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
tst_timer_test.c:348: INFO: CLOCK_MONOTONIC resolution 1ns
tst_timer_test.c:360: INFO: prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) = 50us
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 1000us 500 iterations, threshold 450.01us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 1063us, max 1084us, median 1067us, trunc mean 1066.81us (discarded 25)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 2000us 500 iterations, threshold 450.01us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 2071us, max 2078us, median 2077us, trunc mean 2076.76us (discarded 25)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 5000us 300 iterations, threshold 450.04us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 5066us, max 5108us, median 5106us, trunc mean 5103.24us (discarded 15)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 10000us 100 iterations, threshold 450.33us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 10132us, max 10147us, median 10135us, trunc mean 10138.91us (discarded 5)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 25000us 50 iterations, threshold 451.29us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 25221us, max 25258us, median 25233us, trunc mean 25239.48us (discarded 2)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 100000us 10 iterations, threshold 537.00us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 100215us, max 100773us, median 100684us, trunc mean 100638.44us (discarded 1)
tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: clock_nanosleep() slept for too long
Time: us | Frequency
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100215 | ***********-
100245 |
100275 |
100305 |
100335 |
100365 |
100395 |
100425 |
100455 |
100485 |
100515 |
100545 |
100575 |
100605 |
100635 |
100665 | ********************************************************************
100695 | ***********-
100725 | ***********-
100755 | ***********-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30us | 1 sample = 11.33333 '*', 22.66667 '+', 45.33333 '-', non-zero '.'
tst_timer_test.c:264: INFO: clock_nanosleep() sleeping for 1000000us 2 iterations, threshold 4400.00us
tst_timer_test.c:307: INFO: min 1003376us, max 1005030us, median 1003376us, trunc mean 1003376.00us (discarded 1)
tst_timer_test.c:322: PASS: Measured times are within thresholds
Summary:
passed 6
failed 1
skipped 0
warnings 0 |
|
2020-04-15 08:48:50 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
summary |
clock_nanosleep02 from ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed on some bare metal nodes with X-AWS-4.15 |
clock_nanosleep02 from ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed on some bare metal nodes with X-AWS-4.15 / B-AWS-4.15 |
|
2020-04-15 08:48:55 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
4.15 aws sru-20200406 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 aws bionic sru-20200406 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2020-05-25 09:49:48 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
4.15 aws bionic sru-20200406 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 aws bionic sru-20200406 sru-20200518 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2020-08-24 02:53:53 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
summary |
clock_nanosleep02 from ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed on some bare metal nodes with X-AWS-4.15 / B-AWS-4.15 |
clock_nanosleep02 from ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed on some bare metal nodes with X-AWS-4.15 / B-AWS-4.15 / B-oem-4.15 |
|
2020-10-02 23:55:06 |
Kelsey Steele |
tags |
4.15 aws bionic sru-20200406 sru-20200518 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 aws bionic sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2020-10-07 23:05:03 |
Kelsey Steele |
tags |
4.15 aws bionic sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2020-11-17 04:30:47 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
4.15 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2020-11-17 04:31:01 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
summary |
clock_nanosleep02 from ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed on some bare metal nodes with X-AWS-4.15 / B-AWS-4.15 / B-oem-4.15 |
clock_nanosleep02 from ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed on some bare metal nodes with X-AWS-4.4 / X-AWS-4.15 / B-AWS-4.15 / B-oem-4.15 |
|
2020-12-18 06:15:41 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2021-02-19 18:34:22 |
Francis Ginther |
tags |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 sru-20210125 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2021-02-23 00:46:41 |
Kelsey Steele |
tags |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 sru-20210125 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic fips focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 sru-20210125 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2021-07-15 20:28:39 |
Guilherme G. Piccoli |
tags |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic fips focal sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 sru-20210125 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic fips focal oracle sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 sru-20210125 sru-20210621 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|
2023-04-06 06:00:22 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic fips focal oracle sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 sru-20210125 sru-20210621 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
4.15 4.4 5.4 aws bionic fips focal oracle sru-20200406 sru-20200518 sru-20200921 sru-20201109 sru-20201130 sru-20210125 sru-20210621 sru-20230320 ubuntu-ltp-syscalls xenial |
|