Cannot connect to WiFi as of upgrading to February 17th Daily of Connection Manager (DeprecationWarning)
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Connection Manager |
Fix Committed
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Ubuntu ConnMan Test |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Due to a recent update pushed to the *connman* daily PPA I am no longer able to connect to my wireless network. I noticed this after upgrading to *0.69-0ubuntu1+
I have since downgraded to the last working daily of *connman* (*0.69-
As It happens, owing to Bug #705435, I've taking to using a small reconnection script whenever my connection goes, it goes as follows:
/
cmcc disable $technology
sleep 2
cmcc enable $technology
sleep 4
cmcc edit $SSID ipv4 manual $address $netmask $gateway nameservers $DNS1 $DNS2 $DNS3
cmcc connect $SSID
/
When executing this script manually with the regressed/buggy dailies, I receive the following error which does not appear when using my current working daily:
/
/usr/bin/cmcc:379: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.
print "%s: %s" % (error.
org.freedesktop
/
*Kind Regards,
Lee Hyde.*
tags: | added: cmcc connman connman-dev dbus python |
summary: |
- DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of - Python 2.6 + Cannot connect to WiFi as of upgrading to February 17th Daily of + Connection Manager (DeprecationWarning) |
Changed in ubuntu-connman-test: | |
status: | New → Invalid |
I've recently (for the past couple of hours) been receiving a similar error with the previously uneffected daily which I have been using as a fallback (*0.69- 0ubuntu1+ ind1+r3264+ 201102120323* ). The error output is as follows: message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 _dbus_error_ name, error.message) Error.Failed: Input/output error
/
DeprecationWarning: BaseException.
print "%s: %s" % (error.
net.connman.
/
I have a sneaky suspicion that this latest error has more to do with my router however, and I'll put that to the test once I reboot into Ubuntu.
Has anyone been able to replicate or confirm the original bug, or at least understand what any of these verbose errors mean?