txlongpoll

  1. Bug #900579
  2. Activity log

Activity log for bug #900579

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2011-12-06 02:54:52 Robert Collins bug added bug
2011-12-06 02:57:31 William Grant bug added subscriber William Grant
2011-12-06 09:09:11 Julian Edwards tags lonjgpoll
2011-12-06 09:09:16 Julian Edwards tags lonjgpoll longpoll
2011-12-06 09:56:00 Gavin Panella bug added subscriber Gavin Panella
2012-01-27 00:47:20 Robert Collins description This seems undesirable to me, because any misconfiguration in permissions would trivially allow effectively direct access to suck down messages. (We've had misconfigurations sneak in). I suggest that txlongpoll itself enforce the queue namespace we have (longpoll + random) giving us a defence in depth approach. This seems undesirable to me, because any misconfiguration in permissions would trivially allow effectively direct access to suck down messages. (We've had misconfigurations sneak in). I suggest that txlongpoll itself enforce the queue namespace we have (longpoll + random) giving us a defence in depth approach. This is needed to go live with txlongpoll.