tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider failing to rpm build python-validations-libs on stable branches

Bug #1965426 reported by Douglas Viroel
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
mathieu bultel

Bug Description

tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider is failing on rpmbuild for python-validations-libs on stable branches:

ERROR: validations_libs.tests.callback_plugins.test_vf_validation_stdout (unittest.loader._FailedTest)
ImportError: Failed to import test module: validations_libs.tests.callback_plugins.test_vf_validation_stdout
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/", line 428, in _find_test_path
    module = self._get_module_from_name(name)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/", line 369, in _get_module_from_name
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/validations-libs-1.7.0.dev9/validations_libs/tests/callback_plugins/", line 29, in <module>
    from oslotest import base
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'oslotest'

Tags: ci
Revision history for this message
Douglas Viroel (dviroel) wrote :

Happens on stable/ussuri or older. Missing backports?

Jiri Podivin (jpodivin)
Changed in tripleo:
assignee: nobody → Jiri Podivin (jpodivin)
status: Triaged → In Progress
Jiri Podivin (jpodivin)
Changed in tripleo:
assignee: Jiri Podivin (jpodivin) → mathieu bultel (mat-bultel)
Revision history for this message
Jiri Podivin (jpodivin) wrote :

The backports needed for pipeline unblocking were merged, and the recent build results indicate that the problems were resolved.

However I'm not certain why the stable/train no longer demonstrates this behavior, and there are further differences between successful and failing build logs that can't be accounted for as results of merged patches.

Specifically, the validations-libs repository is no longer checked out, and it's code tested, thus averting the cause of failing jobs described in the bug.

Alan Pevec (apevec)
Changed in tripleo:
status: In Progress → Incomplete
tags: removed: promotion-blocker
Changed in tripleo:
importance: Critical → High
Revision history for this message
Marios Andreou (marios-b) wrote :

no longer an issue apparently (discussed in ruck|rover handoff call today ) is why it was moved to incomplete

Revision history for this message
Jiri Podivin (jpodivin) wrote :

Should we close this as not a bug?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.