Sort by seeders/peers
Bug #496166 reported by
Kẏra
This bug affects 4 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
| transmission (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: transmission
I tend to keep only seed torrents with many seeders only until my ratio hits 1 or 2 but continue seeding torrents with very few seeders indefinitely. I don't know if others do this, but i think being able to view the total amount of seeders/peers reported by the tracker(s) is very useful and we should be able to sort by those.
Revision history for this message
| Charles Kerr (charlesk) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in transmission (Ubuntu): | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
Revision history for this message
| Kẏra (thekyriarchy) wrote | #2 |
Revision history for this message
| Charles Kerr (charlesk) wrote | #3 |
Revision history for this message
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote | #4 |
| Changed in transmission (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
To post a comment you must log in.
I'm not sure how we can go about this in 1.80.
As of 1.80, we announce to a single tracker in each tier of the announce list. So if we get seeder/leecher counts back from scraping N trackers, we have no way of knowing how many of those seeders/leechers overlap from tracker to tracker. About the best we could accurately do is have a range of [minimum possible seeders ... maximum possible seeders] where the minimum is the most seeders returned by any one tracker, and the maximum is he sum of all the trackers' seeder counts.