does TypeEval need an exists() method
Bug #560916 reported by
edA-qa
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TestPlan |
Fix Committed
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Refer to Bug #560678
Does TypeEval need the exists() method? Is it ever actually allowed to return "false". If no such cases now exist then we should remove it to avoid further problems as mentioned in that other bug.
Related branches
Revision history for this message
| edA-qa (eda-qa) wrote | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| edA-qa (eda-qa) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in testplan: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
| status: | New → Fix Committed |
To post a comment you must log in.
There is no such case, so I'll remove it. I can envision reasons to have it, but without a concrete scenario I'd prefer to remove it for now.