unlink_older_than should not use reclaim_age
Bug #1691565 reported by
clayg
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenStack Object Storage (swift) |
Confirmed
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Reclaim age is a very specific tunable that has to do with cleaning up tombstone entries and should be tied to not only your consistency engine cycle time - but also the age at which you can safely re-introduce hardware that has been out of the cluster. It is *very* long.
The same value is also in-explicably used to determine how long to wait before reaping temporary files - generally the default reclaim age is much too long - and specifically it's not in anyway related to tombstone reaping.
The time window/value used with unlink_older_than in the db/object-
Changed in swift: | |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
status: | New → Confirmed |
To post a comment you must log in.