Comment 2 for bug 1857925

Revision history for this message
Johan Ehnberg (johan-ehnberg) wrote :

In our case, we simply do not need LVM, so using that would be an artificial workaround to get encryption with this installer.

It could also be argued from a UX perspective that it is not intuitive to look for encryption as a feature of LVM. Doing so perhaps unnecessarily also loses the flexibility of abstraction provided by d-i.