Sahana RELIEF Experiments

Organization located at first or second level of location does not provide 3rd level coverage

Bug #480985 reported by Mark Prutsalis
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Sahana Agasti
Won't Fix
Low
Unassigned
Sahana RELIEF Experiments
Incomplete
High
Sahana RELIEF Team

Bug Description

In the organization registry - an organization when registered must be located according to Sahana's location hierarchy.

Here at Camp Roberts, we are using a three-tiered hierarchy of State - County - City.

We have County Authorities here that are providing services at the County level - providing coverage for all Cities in the County (we also have State Authorities that are doing the same for the state). So, for example, the County of Monterrey is providing Emergency Management Services at the State-County level. (CA-Monterey County)

When you view reports - Drill Down Location Coverage - all Cities in Monterey County should thus be considered covered for Emergency Management.

This does not work now - cities are shown as uncovered for that service.

Same for top level coverage - something provided at the top or State level should privide coverage at all son/daughter

Gavin Treadgold (gt)
summary: Organization located at first or second level of location does not
- provide 3rd level coverae
+ provide 3rd level coverage
Changed in sahana-relief-experiments:
importance: Undecided → Critical
assignee: nobody → Sahana RELIEF Team (sahana-relief-team)
importance: Critical → High
Revision history for this message
ravithb (ravithb) wrote :

Is there a live instance with data, for me to reproduce this issue? or at least a data dump from a instance with this type of data? Please attach if any.

Revision history for this message
Mark Prutsalis (globaliist) wrote : RE: [Bug 480985] Re: Organization located at first or second level of location does not provide 3rd level coverage

I think we can do a dump. Our local instance we aren't going to be able to make publicly accessible - just using it on local net...

Chamindra - Ravith is looking for a data dump of the db so can look at one of the bugs - could we use the snapshot module for that?

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: <email address hidden> [mailto:<email address hidden>] On Behalf Of
> ravithb
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 1:40 AM
> To: <email address hidden>
> Subject: [Bug 480985] Re: Organization located at first or second level
> of location does not provide 3rd level coverage
>
> Is there a live instance with data, for me to reproduce this issue? or
> at least a data dump from a instance with this type of data? Please
> attach if any.
>
> --
> Organization located at first or second level of location does not
> provide 3rd level coverage
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480985
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Sahana RELIEF Experiments: New
>
> Bug description:
> In the organization registry - an organization when registered must be
> located according to Sahana's location hierarchy.
>
> Here at Camp Roberts, we are using a three-tiered hierarchy of State -
> County - City.
>
> We have County Authorities here that are providing services at the
> County level - providing coverage for all Cities in the County (we also
> have State Authorities that are doing the same for the state). So, for
> example, the County of Monterrey is providing Emergency Management
> Services at the State-County level. (CA-Monterey County)
>
> When you view reports - Drill Down Location Coverage - all Cities in
> Monterey County should thus be considered covered for Emergency
> Management.
>
> This does not work now - cities are shown as uncovered for that
> service.
>
> Same for top level coverage - something provided at the top or State
> level should privide coverage at all son/daughter

dot dot dot (dotdotdotdeactivated-deactivatedaccount)
Changed in sahana-relief-experiments:
status: New → Incomplete
Changed in sahana-agasti:
status: New → Incomplete
importance: Undecided → Medium
Revision history for this message
dot dot dot (dotdotdotdeactivated-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

deprecated module - reopen if module gets a new owner

Changed in sahana-agasti:
importance: Medium → Low
status: Incomplete → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.