[RFE]: neutron purge- shared network without ports in non owner tenant
Bug #1580437 reported by
Alex Stafeyev
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ospurge |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
| python-neutronclient |
New
|
Wishlist
|
harishchandra | ||
| python-openstackclient |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
When we execute "neutron purge tenantID" on a tenant who has shared its network, and that network is in use by another tenant, the network will not be deleted.
When we execute "neutron purge tenantID" on a tenant who has shared its network, and that network is NOT in use by another tenant (seen by it but no ports attached to VMs nor routers), the network will be deleted without any warning message to the user.
We believe that there should be a message verifying the action:
Something like: "This network <ID> may be used by tenants <tenants ID>, are you sure you want to delete this network?
BR
Alex
| Changed in neutron: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Reedip (reedip-banerjee) |
| assignee: | Reedip (reedip-banerjee) → nobody |
| affects: | neutron → python-neutronclient |
Revision history for this message
| John Davidge (john-davidge) wrote | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| Alex Stafeyev (astafeye) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in python-neutronclient: | |
| assignee: | nobody → harishchandra (cogniharish) |
Revision history for this message
| Akihiro Motoki (amotoki) wrote | #3 |
Revision history for this message
| Akihiro Motoki (amotoki) wrote | #4 |
To post a comment you must log in.
The list of tenants who MIGHT be using the network would likely just be every other tenant that exists. Would a message simply saying "Network <ID> is shared. Are you sure you wish to delete it?" be acceptable to you?