suspend/memory_after_suspend_auto give incorrect alert

Bug #1897557 reported by Alex Tu
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Checkbox Provider - Base
Expired
High
Unassigned
OEM Priority Project
New
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

HWE team treats the alarm from the current test case as a false alarm.
So, it needs to be revised.

The false alarm io log:
```
2c2
< total: 16537169920
---
> total: 16537174016
```

refer to https://bugs.launchpad.net/somerville/+bug/1895788/comments/4
comment from HWE

"
From kernel doc. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst

MemTotal
              Total usable RAM (i.e. physical RAM minus a few reserved
              bits and the kernel binary code)

The MemTotal is the total usable memory to the kernel, not total physical RAM size, so it may change.
I can't find a real case about why suspend affects this value, but if this value does not keep changing every time(a memory leak?), we may ignore this failed.
"

"
If it's purpose is to check memory leak, then try suspend 3 times and check if the usable memory keeps decreasing is more reasonable.
"

Alex Tu (alextu)
Changed in oem-priority:
importance: Undecided → High
Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox:
importance: Undecided → High
tags: added: oem-priority originate-from-1895788 somerville
Revision history for this message
Maksim Beliaev (beliaev-maksim) wrote :

Bug was migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/canonical/checkbox/issues/74.
Bug is no more monitored here.

Changed in plainbox-provider-checkbox:
status: New → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.