[RFE] Limits and Counts for SecGroup and FIPs
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| neutron |
Triaged
|
Wishlist
|
Prince Nana Owusu Boateng | ||
Bug Description
[Problem]
As stated in recently submitted bug to OpenStack Client:
OpenStack limits --absolute shows wrong count for 'totalSecurityG
openstack security group create <name> uses neutron API to create security group
openstack limits show --absolute fetches the information from nova api. Since nova-network has been deprecated and current devstack installation runs with neutron as default, it's better to change the way how how openstack limits show fetches its information
[Proposal]
Similar to Mitaka feature of IP Capacity. Provide an admin only feature to return the number of Security Groups, Security Group Rules, Floating IPs used and their absolute limits.
[References]
Original OSC bug
https:/
Paste of difference in nova limits support.
http://
Paste sample return of "openstack limits show --absolute"
http://
| Changed in neutron: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Ankur (ankur-gupta-f) |
| summary: |
- Limits and Counts for SecGroup and FIPs + [RFE] Limits and Counts for SecGroup and FIPs |
| tags: | added: rfe |
| description: | updated |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| Ihar Hrachyshka (ihar-hrachyshka) wrote | #1 |
| Ankur (ankur-gupta-f) wrote | #2 |
| Kevin Benton (kevinbenton) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| assignee: | Ankur (ankur-gupta-f) → nobody |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| assignee: | nobody → Prince Nana Owusu Boateng (nanaboat) |
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote | #4 |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
| Ankur (ankur-gupta-f) wrote | #5 |
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote | #6 |
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote | #7 |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| milestone: | none → pike-1 |
| tags: |
added: rfe-approved removed: rfe |
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote | #8 |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| milestone: | pike-1 → pike-2 |
We seem to already track the needed data in QuotaUsage sqla model (per project_id; we would need to aggregate the data to provide absolute data). The proposal is to expose that data through API, and make OSC use it.
Is it correct?