Activity log for bug #1811836

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2019-01-15 14:17:12 Björn Tillenius bug added bug
2019-01-15 14:17:22 Björn Tillenius maas: status New Triaged
2019-01-15 14:17:26 Björn Tillenius maas: importance Undecided Medium
2019-01-15 14:17:28 Björn Tillenius maas: milestone 2.5.1
2019-01-15 14:17:35 Björn Tillenius tags api
2019-01-16 07:31:18 Andres Rodriguez maas: milestone 2.5.1 2.5.2
2019-02-21 16:20:13 Andres Rodriguez maas: milestone 2.5.2 2.5.3
2019-02-21 16:20:19 Andres Rodriguez maas: milestone 2.5.3 2.5.2
2019-03-05 23:09:19 Andres Rodriguez maas: milestone 2.5.2 2.5.3
2019-05-03 16:10:13 Andres Rodriguez maas: milestone 2.5.3 2.5.4
2019-05-31 14:26:50 Andres Rodriguez maas: milestone 2.5.4
2023-04-06 09:01:13 Jerzy Husakowski maas: milestone 3.4.0
2023-04-06 09:01:22 Jerzy Husakowski summary [2.5, API] allocate command doesn't respect system_id and name when a pod is registered allocate command doesn't respect system_id and name when a pod is registered
2023-04-06 12:42:43 Björn Tillenius description This is with MAAS 2.5.1-7489-g2f25a2cc0-0ubuntu1~18.04.1. I have a normal user and a machine A that is allocated to another user. There's also a pod registered that has capacity to create new VMs. If I use the allocate API like this: maas non-admin machines allocate name=A I get a machine from the pod. The same happens if I specify the system_id instead. This is wrong, since the resulting machine doesn't match the constraint I specified. This is with MAAS 2.5.1-7489-g2f25a2cc0-0ubuntu1~18.04.1. I have a normal user and a machine A that is allocated to another user. There's also a pod registered that has capacity to create new VMs. If I use the allocate API like this:   maas non-admin machines allocate name=A I get a machine from the pod. The same happens if I specify the system_id instead. This is wrong, since the resulting machine doesn't match the constraint I specified. The machine that you get back has an automatically generated name. With MAAS 3.3, it seems that passing a non-existing system_id does indeed fail as expected, but passing in a non-existing name still gives you a (virtual) machine.
2023-06-29 08:33:27 Alberto Donato maas: milestone 3.4.0 3.4.x