In the file view, we should display README files if they're available

What about Markdown, reST, or HTML READMES? Github or one of those sites
displays them as HTML; it's very spiffy. :-)

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Matt Nordhoff
<email address hidden> wrote:
> What about Markdown, reST, or HTML READMES? Github or one of those sites
> displays them as HTML; it's very spiffy. :-)

Whoever implements it gets to choose ;)

--
Martin

On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 22:04 +0000, Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> What about Markdown, reST, or HTML READMES? Github or one of those sites
> displays them as HTML; it's very spiffy. :-)

And possibly safer? Isn't this exactly the same as 'provide raw content
the user has in their branch'?

-Rob

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Robert Collins
<email address hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 22:04 +0000, Matt Nordhoff wrote:
>> What about Markdown, reST, or HTML READMES? Github or one of those sites
>> displays them as HTML; it's very spiffy. :-)
>
> And possibly safer?  Isn't this exactly the same as 'provide raw content
> the user has in their branch'?

Currently, we display files as HTML in th annotate view. We *could*
just do the same, as we're already escaping and such.

--
Martin