Right are you going to look into those as well? Or should I ask mwhudson to chip in?
thanks,
Ilias
-- Ilias Biris - <email address hidden> Technical Program Manager, Linaro M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris, Skype: ilias_biris Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
On 29 January 2014 14:51, Riku Voipio <email address hidden> wrote:
> There's more aarch64 porting needed than just atomics. For example, a > code copy of: > > https://code.google.com/p/linux-syscall-support/ > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091352 > > Title: > gperftools support is missing > > Status in Linaro AArch64 cross-distro work: > In Progress > > Bug description: > http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/ lacks AArch64 support. > > When tried to cross compile it tries to use x86 assembly. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1091352/+subscriptions >
Right are you going to look into those as well? Or should I ask mwhudson
to chip in?
thanks,
Ilias
--
Ilias Biris - <email address hidden>
Technical Program Manager, Linaro
M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris, Skype: ilias_biris
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
On 29 January 2014 14:51, Riku Voipio <email address hidden> wrote:
> There's more aarch64 porting needed than just atomics. For example, a /code.google. com/p/linux- syscall- support/ /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1091352 code.google. com/p/gperftool s/ lacks AArch64 support. /bugs.launchpad .net/linaro- aarch64/ +bug/1091352/ +subscriptions
> code copy of:
>
> https:/
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> gperftools support is missing
>
> Status in Linaro AArch64 cross-distro work:
> In Progress
>
> Bug description:
> http://
>
> When tried to cross compile it tries to use x86 assembly.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>