Booting back to master in wg class fails

Yeah it looks like it is yet another "there is another boot device option"

https://staging.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/48746/log_file#L_724_0

[1] Firmware Volume (4068 MB)
[2] Firmware Volume (4068 MB)
[3] NOR Flash (63 MB)
[4] BOOT (99 MB)
[5] TESTBOOT (99 MB)
[6] SDCARD (2043 MB)
[7] VenHw(E7223039-5836-41E1-B542-D7EC736C5E59)
[8] VenHw(02118005-9DA7-443A-92D5-781F022AEDBB)
[9] PXE on MAC Address: 00:02:F7:00:58:37
[10] TFTP on MAC Address: 00:02:F7:00:58:37

and LAVA sends 5 which is the TESTBOOT partition, not the BOOT partition

Hmmm. 0.7.1 firmware and the new hwpacks should result in the same boot
options.

On 14 June 2014 02:41, Tyler Baker <email address hidden> wrote:

> Yeah it looks like it is yet another "there is another boot device
> option"
>
> https://staging.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/48746/log_file#L_724_0
>
> [1] Firmware Volume (4068 MB)
> [2] Firmware Volume (4068 MB)
> [3] NOR Flash (63 MB)
> [4] BOOT (99 MB)
> [5] TESTBOOT (99 MB)
> [6] SDCARD (2043 MB)
> [7] VenHw(E7223039-5836-41E1-B542-D7EC736C5E59)
> [8] VenHw(02118005-9DA7-443A-92D5-781F022AEDBB)
> [9] PXE on MAC Address: 00:02:F7:00:58:37
> [10] TFTP on MAC Address: 00:02:F7:00:58:37
>
> and LAVA sends 5 which is the TESTBOOT partition, not the BOOT partition
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Linaro
> Validation Team, which is subscribed to LAVA Dispatcher.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1329665
>
> Title:
> Booting back to master in wg class fails
>
> Status in LAVA Dispatcher:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Something odd is happening when booting back into the master image:
>
> https://staging.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/48746/log_file#L_684
>
> If you notice, it seems to be issuing the test boot command config,
> even though it is clearly stating that it's trying to boot the master
> and looking for the master shell prompt.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+bug/1329665/+subscriptions
>

--

Alan Bennett, Director of Product Technology
Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs |
Follow Linaro*:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg> | Blog
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/>
irc: akbennett | <email address hidden> | linaro toolchain, linaro stable
kernel & linaro lava

All the boards have been updated and the issue is observed only on the board in staging?

The issue is observed on other boards. Latest LSK image submitted, hasn't booted because of this issue:
https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/133578

Actually, that job fails for a different reason: https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/133578/log_file#L_23_198

It says it can't find the dtb. Has the dtb name changed from "juno.dtb" in OE images?

The "5" it sends is coming from the test boot commands - it's not using boot_cmds_master, because that sends a "4"

Is everything working now?

On 18 June 2014 03:58, Dave Pigott <email address hidden> wrote:

> The "5" it sends is coming from the test boot commands - it's not using
> boot_cmds_master, because that sends a "4"
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Linaro
> Validation Team, which is subscribed to LAVA Dispatcher.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1329665
>
> Title:
> Booting back to master in wg class fails
>
> Status in LAVA Dispatcher:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Something odd is happening when booting back into the master image:
>
> https://staging.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/48746/log_file#L_684
>
> If you notice, it seems to be issuing the test boot command config,
> even though it is clearly stating that it's trying to boot the master
> and looking for the master shell prompt.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-dispatcher/+bug/1329665/+subscriptions
>

--

Alan Bennett, Director of Product Technology
Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs |
Follow Linaro*:* Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg> | Blog
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/>
irc: akbennett | <email address hidden> | linaro toolchain, linaro stable
kernel & linaro lava

yes, it's working now. sendline has been updated.