<email address hidden> interacts poorly with debian.org

Bug #82718 reported by Christian Reis
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Triaged
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

We currently use the address <email address hidden> as the envelope sender for email validation mail sent to end-users. This unfortunately interacts poorly with debian.org's smartlist. In particular, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=111652

We should change the envelope sender; James T. suggests using <email address hidden>, which according to him has precedent and shouldn't break smartlist.

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote :

I have filed an RT request for an accessible mailbox for bounces. Perhaps a mailing list is the best solution; not sure.

Changed in launchpad:
importance: Undecided → High
status: Unconfirmed → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Stuart Bishop (stub) wrote :

We already use <email address hidden> to explicitly throw away replies from automatic notifications that cannot handle replies (as opposed to <email address hidden>, which will one day have a bounce processor to flag obsolete email addresses)

What messages will we get sent to the address in the envelope sender?

Errors-To: header can keep set to <email address hidden> for all the bounces from modern mail handlers.

Revision history for this message
James Henstridge (jamesh) wrote :

According to the Debian bug, "<email address hidden>" would be just as bad as "<email address hidden>". It isn't the domain that is the problem -- it is the user name portion.

Revision history for this message
Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote :

Ok, so perhaps '<email address hidden>' as the local-part?

tags: added: email notifications
removed: lp-foundations
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.