| 2011-04-05 00:22:38 |
Robert Collins |
description |
affects launchpad-code
done
It would be nice, when working on something that is embargoed..
it has some code that is 'upstream' [with private branches enabled], and
some code that is 'packaging' - branches of upstream with debian/ added.
The packaging branches are built in a private ppa using deb source
packages, but the right place to push those branches is
~team/ubuntu/karmic/<embargoed-package-name>/ppa.
Is is possible to have branches pushed to that sort of url honour the
upstream private-branches settings?
jml says probably no and that I should file a bug.
-Rob
|
It would be nice, when working on something that is embargoed..
it has some code that is 'upstream' [with private branches enabled], and
some code that is 'packaging' - branches of upstream with debian/ added.
The packaging branches are built in a private ppa using deb source
packages, but the right place to push those branches is
~team/ubuntu/karmic/<embargoed-package-name>/ppa.
Is is possible to have branches pushed to that sort of url honour the
upstream private-branches settings?
jml says probably no and that I should file a bug.
Related to this bug is bug 347772 which asks for private branch support for package branches in their own right. They don't appear to be duplicates, though quite closely related. |
|
