Repository format should explain what version of bzr is needed
Bug #250160 reported by
Martin Albisetti
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bazaar |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
| Launchpad itself |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Now that the repository format is shown in the branch's page, it would be great for new users to tell them what version of bzr supports that format.
bzr 0.11 is in Debian stable, so users drop in and don't understand why they can't branch, and with a new format coming up soon, this will make even more sense.
| Changed in launchpad-bazaar: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| status: | New → Triaged |
Revision history for this message
| Tim Penhey (thumper) wrote | #1 |
Revision history for this message
| Jonathan Lange (jml) wrote | #2 |
Revision history for this message
| Vincent Ladeuil (vila) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in bzr: | |
| status: | New → Incomplete |
Revision history for this message
| Jonathan Lange (jml) wrote Re: [Bug 250160] Re: Repository format should explain what version of bzr is needed | #4 |
| Changed in launchpad: | |
| importance: | Medium → Low |
| Changed in bzr: | |
| status: | Incomplete → Triaged |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
| tags: | added: check-for-breezy |
To post a comment you must log in.
On the whole we use the description strings directly from bzr, so really the bzr strings should be updated.