+activereviews doesn't distinguish MPs that are old or need re-review
Bug #1483072 reported by
Paul Gear
This bug affects 3 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launchpad itself |
Triaged
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
When looking through an active reviews page, e.g. https:/
a) when the proposal was last updated, and
b) whether the submitter has re-submitted the proposal since the most recent non-approval comment
It's also desirable for these (and the original submission date) to be separate columns that can be chosen as sort fields, so that the most actionable MPs can be viewed first.
| Changed in launchpad: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| Changed in launchpad: | |
| importance: | Wishlist → High |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| tags: | added: code-review ui |
| summary: |
- activereviews needs separate date & status columns + +activereview doesn't distinguish MPs that are old or need re-review |
| summary: |
- +activereview doesn't distinguish MPs that are old or need re-review + +activereviews doesn't distinguish MPs that are old or need re-review |
To post a comment you must log in.
