Bug #1122 “Pitti gets no lovemail from bug 311” : Bugs : Launchpad itself

Pitti gets no lovemail from bug 311

Bug #1122 reported by Christian Reis
6
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Fix Released
Medium
Brad Bollenbach

Bug Description

We've been having this great get-together on bug 311, but Martin Pitt (account name100) has not been receiving bug messages, and we don't know why.

We've been having this great get-together on bug 311, but Martin Pitt (account name100) has not been receiving bug messages, and we don't know why.

Tags: lp-bugs
Revision history for this message
Guilherme Salgado (salgado) wrote :

And he has a preferred email!

Revision history for this message
Brad Bollenbach (bradb) wrote :

Strange. pitti, did you get this bugmail? Are you getting other bugmail? Are there any other bugs on which you're Cc'd but not getting the bugmail?

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

I did get this email, it was just classified as spam, so I didn't read it for a while. Sorry...

Revision history for this message
Brad Bollenbach (bradb) wrote :

Interesting. Why was it classified as spam?

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

Whoops, the "Why was it classified as spam?" was classified as spam, too:

 pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95%
                            [score: 0.8193]
 3.0 FROM_ALL_NUMS From an address that is all numbers (non-phone)

sorry, this is obviously a problem on my end. Unless anybody else has still problems, I suggest to just close it. I'm 100% sure that I didn't get some mail from #311, but since the merge of my user accounts this seems to have resolved.

I'll train my spam filter to treat this better, sorry.

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote : Re: [Bug 1122] Pitti gets no lovemail from bug 311

I'm worried that others will have the same sort of problem with Malone
when using Spamassasin, however.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

Would changing <email address hidden> to <email address hidden> help?

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote :

Well, <email address hidden> would be sweet, wouldn't it?

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125

Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

> Would changing <email address hidden> to <email address hidden> help?

Not really, the last three mails all had scores between 3.4 and 3.6. But at least I get them now (my limit is 4.0, which usually yields only very few false positives. I fed them to the ham learner, and it got better now.

Damn spam...

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote :

On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:57:47AM -0000, Martin Pitt via Malone wrote:
> > Would changing <email address hidden> to <email address hidden> help?
>
> Not really, the last three mails all had scores between 3.4 and 3.6.

I don't understand what you mean. AIUI the rule SA was matching on was
an email whose name part consisted of all numbers (at least the rule
name suggested that). Changing the email address to contain the term
"bug" would avoid that, right?

What do the scores of the last 3 emails have to do with that? :-)

Brad Bollenbach (bradb)
Changed in malone:
assignee: nobody → bradb
status: New → Fixed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Loading subscribers...

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.