linux-hwe-edge: 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1691149 reported by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Certification-testing
Invalid
Medium
Taihsiang Ho
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Security Team
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the <version to be filled> upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
kernel-stable-master-bug: 1691146
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

CVE References

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: xenial
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.05.16-1
tags: added: kernel-sru-backport-of-1691146
summary: - linux-hwe-edge: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker
+ linux-hwe-edge: 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1 -proposed tracker
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: block-proposed
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rizzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (taihsiangho) wrote :

No need to has certification test. Fix incorrect status assignment for certification-test.

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: removed: block-proposed-xenial
tags: removed: block-proposed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :
Download full text (16.1 KiB)

This bug was fixed in the package linux-hwe-edge - 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1

---------------
linux-hwe-edge (4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=low

  * linux-hwe-edge: 4.10.0-22.24~16.04.1 -proposed tracker (LP: #1691149)

  * linux: 4.10.0-22.24 -proposed tracker (LP: #1691146)

  * Fix NVLINK2 TCE route (LP: #1690155)
    - powerpc/powernv: Fix TCE kill on NVLink2

  * CVE-2017-0605
    - tracing: Use strlcpy() instead of strcpy() in __trace_find_cmdline()

  * perf: qcom: Add L3 cache PMU driver (LP: #1689856)
    - [Config] CONFIG_QCOM_L3_PMU=y
    - perf: qcom: Add L3 cache PMU driver

  * No PMU support for ACPI-based arm64 systems (LP: #1689661)
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rework per-cpu allocation
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: manage interrupts per-cpu
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split irq request from enable
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs()
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic
    - arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table
    - [Config] CONFIG_ARM_PMU_ACPI=y
    - drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework
    - arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing
    - arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework

  * [SRU][Zesty]QDF2400 kernel oops on ipmitool fru write 0 fru.bin
    (LP: #1689886)
    - ipmi: Fix kernel panic at ipmi_ssif_thread()

  * tty: pl011: fix earlycon work-around for QDF2400 erratum 44 (LP: #1689818)
    - tty: pl011: fix earlycon work-around for QDF2400 erratum 44
    - tty: pl011: use "qdf2400_e44" as the earlycon name for QDF2400 E44

  * kernel-wedge fails in artful due to leftover squashfs-modules d-i files
    (LP: #1688259)
    - Remove squashfs-modules files from d-i
    - [Config] as squashfs-modules is builtin kernel-image must Provides: it

  * arm64/ACPI support for SBSA watchdog (LP: #1688114)
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: clean up printk usage
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: rename type macros
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: rename the PPI enum
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: move enums and defines to header file
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add a new enum for spi type
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: rework PPI selection
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: split dt-only rate handling
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: refactor arch_timer_needs_probing
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: move arch_timer_needs_of_probing into DT init
      call
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: add structs to describe MMIO timer
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: split MMIO timer probing.
    - [Config] CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT=y
    - acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver
    - clocksource: arm_arch_timer: simplify ACPI support code.
    - acpi/arm64: Add memory-mapped timer support in GTD...

Changed in linux-hwe-edge (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Fix Released
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.