Missing InfluxDB Relation
Bug #1722295 reported by
Fatih Nar
This bug affects 3 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grafana Charm |
Won't Fix
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
| InfluxDB Charm |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Grafana has been heavily used with InfluxDB and the relation between Grafana and InfluxDB seems has not been yet implemented, sincerely requesting it.
Revision history for this message
| Junien Fridrick (axino) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in charm-grafana: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in influxdb-charm: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in charm-grafana: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| tags: | added: bseng-2 |
| tags: | added: bseng-3 |
| Changed in charm-grafana: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Won't Fix |
To post a comment you must log in.
Hi,
We've already started working on this, and the influxdb now provides "grafana-source", so you can relate them.
The relation is not fully complete, as you still need to create users and databases in influxdb and instruct grafana to use them manually (see README), but it's a start.
Adding user/database management is a more complex topic (and, as I understand things, the current "grafana-source" interface is lacking the means of handling this), it may end up being a juju action.