2009-01-06 15:50:43 |
Martin Pitt |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2009-01-06 15:50:56 |
Martin Pitt |
bug |
|
|
assigned to gtk |
2009-01-06 15:51:09 |
Martin Pitt |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Till Kamppeter |
2009-01-06 15:51:27 |
Martin Pitt |
gtk+2.0: status |
New |
Triaged |
|
2009-01-06 15:51:27 |
Martin Pitt |
gtk+2.0: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
2009-01-06 15:51:27 |
Martin Pitt |
gtk+2.0: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
2009-01-06 17:12:34 |
Martin Pitt |
bug |
|
|
assigned to qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) |
2009-01-06 17:13:09 |
Martin Pitt |
qt4-x11: status |
New |
Triaged |
|
2009-01-06 17:13:09 |
Martin Pitt |
qt4-x11: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
2009-01-06 17:13:09 |
Martin Pitt |
qt4-x11: statusexplanation |
|
I also filed it at the upstream Qt tracker, but did not get a ticket ID/URL. Maybe they need to approve it, or something. |
|
2009-01-07 08:21:06 |
Bug Watch Updater |
gtk: status |
Unknown |
New |
|
2009-01-19 08:18:18 |
Martin Pitt |
gtk+2.0: assignee |
|
pitti |
|
2010-08-16 12:05:49 |
Till Kamppeter |
description |
The main reason why Debian/Ubuntu does not enable automatic printer detection
in cups by default is that there is no way to tell apart locally configured
(and thus trusted) printers from those which got detected automatically (and
thus open the possibility of luring someone into printing confidential material
onto a rogue network printer).
E. g. I have a locally configured "local_ps" printer, and an ML-1610 which
comes through cups browsing detection. The print dialog currently looks like
this:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/screenshots/print_dialog_gtk.png
the printers look exactly the same, I have no way to tell which ones can be
considered trusted. It would be great to separate the locally configured from
the remotely detected ones:
|_| Print to file |
|=| HP DeskJet 123 | room 10 |
|=| Samsung Foo Color | |
Automatically detected remote printers:
|=| ML-1610 | dagobert |
They can be told apart with the CUPS_PRINTER_DISCOVERED flag (see cups/cups.h). |
The main reason why Debian/Ubuntu does not enable automatic use of network printers broadcasted by remote CUPS servers by default is that there is no way to tell apart locally configured (and thus trusted) printers from those which got advertized by remote CUPS servers (and thus open the possibility of luring someone into printing confidential material onto a rogue network printer).
E. g. I have a locally configured "local_ps" printer, and an ML-1610 configured on a remote server which appears through cups browsing detection. The print dialog currently looks like this:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/screenshots/print_dialog_gtk.png
the printers look exactly the same, I have no way to tell which ones can be considered trusted. It would be great to separate the locally configured from the remotely detected ones:
|_| Print to file |
Locally configured printers:
|=| HP DeskJet 123 | room 10 |
|=| Samsung Foo Color | |
Automatically detected remote printers:
|=| ML-1610 | dagobert |
Locally configured and automatically discovered remote printers can be told apart with the CUPS_PRINTER_DISCOVERED flag (see cups/cups.h).
|
|
2010-08-16 12:06:49 |
Till Kamppeter |
summary |
Please separate autodetected from locally configured printers |
Please separate automatically discovered remote printers from locally configured printers |
|
2010-08-16 12:08:17 |
Till Kamppeter |
bug task added |
|
hundredpapercuts |
|
2010-08-16 12:09:19 |
Till Kamppeter |
bug task added |
|
qt |
|
2010-08-16 12:32:13 |
Till Kamppeter |
attachment added |
|
Screenshot of the bug description https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/qt/+bug/314408/+attachment/1493206/+files/print_dialog_gtk.png |
|
2010-09-15 19:44:54 |
Bug Watch Updater |
gtk: importance |
Unknown |
Wishlist |
|
2010-12-23 17:11:57 |
Chris Wilson |
hundredpapercuts: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
2011-01-20 18:29:48 |
Chris Wilson |
hundredpapercuts: importance |
Undecided |
Medium |
|
2011-05-23 12:59:13 |
Martin Pitt |
affects |
gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) |
|
2012-06-01 17:15:49 |
Martin Pitt |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu): assignee |
Martin Pitt (pitti) |
|
|
2012-07-20 15:55:21 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
affects |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) |
ubuntu |
|
2012-07-20 15:55:21 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
ubuntu: status |
Triaged |
Confirmed |
|
2012-07-20 15:55:21 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
ubuntu: assignee |
|
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) |
|
2012-07-20 16:56:28 |
Martin Pitt |
affects |
ubuntu |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) |
|
2012-12-18 20:22:41 |
John Swing |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber John Swing |
2013-05-29 13:49:37 |
Alberto Salvia Novella |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu): status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
2013-05-29 13:49:43 |
Alberto Salvia Novella |
hundredpapercuts: status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
2013-05-29 13:50:13 |
Alberto Salvia Novella |
hundredpapercuts: assignee |
|
Paper Cuts Ninja (papercuts-ninja) |
|
2013-05-29 19:16:07 |
Chris Wilson |
hundredpapercuts: milestone |
|
papercuts-s-gtk |
|
2013-10-21 12:26:20 |
Catalin Hritcu |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Catalin Hritcu |
2014-01-08 11:44:29 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu): status |
Triaged |
In Progress |
|
2014-01-08 15:27:43 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
affects |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) |
ubuntu |
|
2014-01-08 15:27:43 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
ubuntu: status |
In Progress |
Triaged |
|
2014-01-08 15:27:43 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
ubuntu: assignee |
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) |
|
|
2014-01-08 15:28:12 |
Matthew Paul Thomas |
description |
The main reason why Debian/Ubuntu does not enable automatic use of network printers broadcasted by remote CUPS servers by default is that there is no way to tell apart locally configured (and thus trusted) printers from those which got advertized by remote CUPS servers (and thus open the possibility of luring someone into printing confidential material onto a rogue network printer).
E. g. I have a locally configured "local_ps" printer, and an ML-1610 configured on a remote server which appears through cups browsing detection. The print dialog currently looks like this:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/screenshots/print_dialog_gtk.png
the printers look exactly the same, I have no way to tell which ones can be considered trusted. It would be great to separate the locally configured from the remotely detected ones:
|_| Print to file |
Locally configured printers:
|=| HP DeskJet 123 | room 10 |
|=| Samsung Foo Color | |
Automatically detected remote printers:
|=| ML-1610 | dagobert |
Locally configured and automatically discovered remote printers can be told apart with the CUPS_PRINTER_DISCOVERED flag (see cups/cups.h).
|
The main reason why Debian/Ubuntu does not enable automatic use of network printers broadcasted by remote CUPS servers by default is that there is no way to tell apart locally configured (and thus trusted) printers from those which got advertized by remote CUPS servers (and thus open the possibility of luring someone into printing confidential material onto a rogue network printer).
E. g. I have a locally configured "local_ps" printer, and an ML-1610 configured on a remote server which appears through cups browsing detection. The print dialog currently looks like this:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/screenshots/print_dialog_gtk.png
the printers look exactly the same, I have no way to tell which ones can be considered trusted. It would be great to separate the locally configured from the remotely detected ones:
|_| Print to file |
Locally configured printers:
|=| HP DeskJet 123 | room 10 |
|=| Samsung Foo Color | |
Automatically detected remote printers:
|=| ML-1610 | dagobert |
Locally configured and automatically discovered remote printers can be told apart with the CUPS_PRINTER_DISCOVERED flag (see cups/cups.h).
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Printing#listing>: "whenever available printers are listed, they should be listed in up to two sections: * Whenever at least one manually configured printer is available, a section beginning with an insensitive item, “Configured printers”. * Whenever at least one broadcast printer is available, a section beginning with an insensitive item, “Discovered printers”." |
|
2014-01-08 15:42:00 |
Alberto Salvia Novella |
hundredpapercuts: assignee |
Papercuts Ninjas (papercuts-ninja) |
|
|
2014-01-08 16:06:25 |
Sebastien Bacher |
affects |
ubuntu |
gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) |
|
2014-10-13 07:27:43 |
Roman Shipovskij |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Roman Shipovskij |
2014-10-13 07:30:30 |
Roman Shipovskij |
removed subscriber Roman Shipovskij |
|
|
|
2014-10-13 07:31:17 |
Roman Shipovskij |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Roman Shipovskij |
2018-02-10 05:32:12 |
Bug Watch Updater |
gtk: status |
New |
Expired |
|