[power]: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in got_power_proxy_cb()
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
gnome-control-center |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
|||
gnome-control-center (Fedora) |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
|||
gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Michael Terry |
Bug Description
did an update...then went to change something in online accounts
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gnome-control-
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-14-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Feb 9 09:19:15 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110427.1)
ProcCmdline: gnome-control-
SegvAnalysis:
Segfault happened at: 0x10e05d0: mov %eax,0x10(%esi)
PC (0x010e05d0) ok
source "%eax" ok
destination "0x10(%esi)" (0xaaaaaaba) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-control-
StacktraceTop:
?? () from /usr/lib/
g_simple_
?? () from /usr/lib/
?? () from /lib/i386-
g_main_
Title: gnome-control-
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-03 (5 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare video
usr_lib_
deja-dup 21.2-0ubuntu4
gnome-bluetooth 3.2.2-0ubuntu1
indicator-datetime 0.3.1-0ubuntu5
visibility: | private → public |
summary: |
- gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in got_power_proxy_cb() + [power]: gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in + got_power_proxy_cb() |
Changed in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Medium → Low |
Changed in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Michael Terry (mterry) |
status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
Changed in gnome-control-center: | |
importance: | Unknown → Medium |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in gnome-control-center: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in gnome-control-center (Fedora): | |
importance: | Unknown → Undecided |
status: | Unknown → Won't Fix |
This crash has the same stack trace characteristics as bug #859217. However, the latter was already fixed in an earlier package version than the one in this report. This might be a regression or because the problem is in a dependent package.