On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:14:32AM -0000, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> • There are no instances of snprintf in your results.
I haven't yet re-run the search with snprintf.
> • Does your search include DBS style tarball-inside-a-tarball packages?
It does not yet, but I've put together a script that will attempt to apply
all patches before doing the search. I was going to merge this when adding
the snprintf regex.
> Matthias, shall I go ahead and use massfile to create 231 bugs for this
> issue?
It probably makes more sense to approach Debian with the mass-filing. I'd
be happy to help drive this.
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:14:32AM -0000, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> • There are no instances of snprintf in your results.
I haven't yet re-run the search with snprintf.
> • Does your search include DBS style tarball- inside- a-tarball packages?
It does not yet, but I've put together a script that will attempt to apply
all patches before doing the search. I was going to merge this when adding
the snprintf regex.
> Matthias, shall I go ahead and use massfile to create 231 bugs for this
> issue?
It probably makes more sense to approach Debian with the mass-filing. I'd
be happy to help drive this.
http:// www.debian. org/doc/ developers- reference/ beyond- pkging. html#submit- many-bugs