because ifcvt calls noce_get_condition which calls canonicalize_condition, and the latter has a general rule to transform (GE x const) to (GT x const-1).
So the careful code in e.g. cbranchdi4 to not generate unimplemented comparisons is neutralized by generic code.
Do DImode comparisons really have to be asymmetric? I.e., could CC_NCV be removed? I see that LT is apparently supported so why can't GT be too?
Created attachment 24503
more reduced test case, ICEs at -O1 for armv5te and armv6
Using this slightly more reduced test case I've found that gcc transforms
(set (reg:CC_NCV ...) (compare:CC_NCV (reg:DI ...) (const_int 1 ...)))
(if_then_else (ge (reg:CC_NCV ...) ...) ...)
to
(set (reg:CC_NCV ...) (compare:CC_NCV (reg:DI ...) (const_int 0 ...)))
(if_then_else (gt (reg:CC_NCV ...) ...)
because ifcvt calls noce_get_condition which calls canonicalize_ condition, and the latter has a general rule to transform (GE x const) to (GT x const-1).
So the careful code in e.g. cbranchdi4 to not generate unimplemented comparisons is neutralized by generic code.
Do DImode comparisons really have to be asymmetric? I.e., could CC_NCV be removed? I see that LT is apparently supported so why can't GT be too?