REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review/sponsor Bugmail extension for Thunderbird

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:37:41PM -0000, Saša Bodiroža wrote:
> ** Changed in: firefox-extensions
> Assignee: Saša Bodiroža (jazzva) => (unassigned)
> Status: In Progress => Confirmed
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-extensions
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

Was the licensing ok?

 - Alexander

Alexander Sack wrote:
> Was the licensing ok?
>
> - Alexander
>

Yep, GPL. It was confirmed by mail. I'll ask him to provide a license
fail for the next upload, if that's ok.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 07:03:59PM -0000, Saša Bodiroža wrote:
> Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Was the licensing ok?
> >
> > - Alexander
> >
>
> Yep, GPL. It was confirmed by mail. I'll ask him to provide a license
> fail for the next upload, if that's ok.
>

Sure. i guess he will not have problems to add that to the .xpi top
level dir. At least he chose GPL, so he wont feel offended :).

 - Alexander

Any news on this? do we have all needed license headers now? if yes, I gonna take care reviewing this package.

Hello Andrea,

Just give me a day or two to update the branch. I have checked now,
and version 1.5, which is available on addons.mozilla.org, contains a
license file.

marking this as incomplete and assigning the bug report to you while you fix the license issue. Feel free to set it back as confirmed (plus unassigning you from the bug again) when the branch has been updated.

any news on this?

Hello Andrea,

Sorry for the delay (been pretty busy in the past few months).

The new version (1.6) is detected in Thunderbird 2.0.0.22, but it's not really showing up in bug mails. Could you (or someone other) test (building with "bzr builddeb") the current revision in the linked branch before uploading, because I would like to be sure that it's not just my configuration that is causing the extension to not work, before reporting this upstream.

Thanks.

Saša Bodiroža wrote:
> The new version (1.6) is detected in Thunderbird 2.0.0.22, but it's not
> really showing up in bug mails.

I have found the bug, and will e-mail upstream developer. With version
1.5, I can see the box with bug data, but it's collapsed (so, that's
still not usable).

ok, just let me know when you have a working package ready and I'll take a look at it.

Hello Andrea,

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> ok, just let me know when you have a working package ready and I'll take
> a look at it.

It's ready, you can get it from the linked branch and run "bzr builddeb".

you said me the current version doesnt work. Did upstream already fixed the issue you were talking about?

Hello Andrea,

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> you said me the current version doesnt work. Did upstream already fixed
> the issue you were talking about?

Yes, I received response from him few hours ago that he fixed the
problem, and uploaded the new version to addons.mozilla.org.

Perfect, gonna process this tomorrow.

Package looks good, but I get three minor lintian warnings:

W: bugmail-extension source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends bugmail-extension
W: bugmail-extension source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.2)
W: bugmail-extension: extra-license-file usr/share/bugmail-extension/LICENSE

Apart from those the package builds/installs and work fine in thunderbird.

Do you want me to upload anyway or you wanna fix those?

you should also update maintainer field with this mail: Ubuntu Developers <email address hidden> not the old one as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField

Hello Andrea,

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> you should also update maintainer field with this mail: Ubuntu
> Developers <email address hidden> not the old one as
> per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField

Thanks, I didn't know about new DebianMaintainerField spec. I updated
that and bumped Standards-Version to 3.8.2. I can add misc:Depends,
but I don't think it's needed in this package. As for the
extra-license-file, I think it's not a big issue. If you want, I can
fix it, but I would need your help to tell me how to remove it from
the package.

New revisions are located in the linked branch. If you ask me, I would
say it's ready for the upload.

Thanks for your sponsorship.

Uploaded. Thanks for your work :)

Hello Andrea,

I just noticed that I have forgot to change target from UNRELEASED to karmic in debian/changelog. I pushed a new revision with just that change. Should I bump version to -0ubuntu2 instead?

Or will it be OK with UNRELEASED (e.g. archive administrators will fix that)?

Sorry for this.

I fixed that for you ;)

just fix it on your branch, don't have to add a new changelog entry :)

Package has been accepted through the NEW queue. Moving the bug status to fix released.