Hi Dan,

Yes, you are correct.  The status did change and I was looking at the stop
fine reason on the items out screen.  That being said staff are still going
to think nothing happened if they do not have the item status column
displayed. Maybe a wish list would be for a popup message to confirm the
change was made.

Thank you for all your work on this, Dan. I will sign off on the bug fix.

Dawn Dale
PINES Services Specialist, Circulation
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place Suite 150
Atlanta, GA 30345
404-235-7136
<email address hidden>

** The GPLS office is in the midst of relocating offices. We may be reached
by all of the current mechanisms during the transition, but to ensure the
most prompt response, please use the Help
Desk:  https://help.georgialibraries.org
<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://help.georgialibraries.org&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1531922186441000&usg=AFQjCNEd0qVYxcDyllXYUKTaXz6p7bPNRA>*


On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Dan Wells <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hello Dawn,
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> Are you sure the item status did not change?  The default columns do not
> actually show the Copy/Item status, only the stop fines reason, which in
> my branch will not change.  If you add the Copy Status column to the
> items out view, or look at the item itself using Item Status, you should
> see the new 'Lost' status.
>
> Please let me know if you do not.  It is unfortunate that, by default,
> stop_fines is prominently displayed while item status is not, so maybe
> that needs to be reconsidered a bit.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dan
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1562061
>
> Title:
>   Marking a Long Overdue transaction Lost adds a second bill to the
>   patron record
>
> Status in Evergreen:
>   Confirmed
> Status in Evergreen 3.0 series:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   If a patron has been billed for an item using a Mark Long-Overdue
>   action trigger, it is possible to add a second bill to the patron's
>   record for the item in a couple of ways.
>
>   First, marking the long overdue item Lost by patron will add a second
>   bill. To reproduce:
>
>   - Retrieve a patron record that has an item that is Long Overdue.
>   - Select the Long Overdue transaction and choose Mark Item Lost(by
> patron) from the actions menu.
>   - On the patron's bills screen, select the now Lost transaction and view
> the Full Details.
>
>   Under the billings, you will see a bill for the cost of the item with
>   the billing type Lost Materials as well as a bill with billing type
>   Long Overdue Materials.
>
>   Note that the client will not allow "Mark Lost(by patron)" if an item
>   has already been marked Lost.
>
>   Second, using the Mark Lost action trigger after the item is already
>   Long Overdue will add a second bill, one with the billing type "Long
>   Overdue Materials" and another with the billing type "Lost Materials"
>
>   Once the patron has been billed for the cost of the item, a second
>   system generated billing for the cost should not be allowed.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1562061/+subscriptions
>