Activity log for bug #1694272

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2017-05-29 14:04:33 Jason Xing bug added bug
2017-05-29 14:05:25 Jason Xing description I am here reopening the bug report about ecryptfs-recover-private command(see #1028532).That patch written by Dustin has fixed the issue that if mount command fails, user should be prompted (see r823: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ecryptfs/ecryptfs/trunk/revision/823). I think user should be prompted that the file may not be decrypted successfully though user can mount it to /tmp/ecryptfs.XXXXXX because the manner of recovery is like that of "sudo mount -t ecryptfs <secure> <raw>" command, that is to say, we can mount with different passphrases but only the right passphrase can decrypt files. I am here reopening the bug report about ecryptfs-recover-private command(see lp1028532).That patch written by Dustin has fixed the issue that if mount command fails, user should be prompted (see r823: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ecryptfs/ecryptfs/trunk/revision/823). I think user should be prompted that the file may not be decrypted successfully though user can mount it to /tmp/ecryptfs.XXXXXX because the manner of recovery is like that of "sudo mount -t ecryptfs <secure> <raw>" command, that is to say, we can mount with different passphrases but only the right passphrase can decrypt files.
2017-05-29 14:05:41 Jason Xing description I am here reopening the bug report about ecryptfs-recover-private command(see lp1028532).That patch written by Dustin has fixed the issue that if mount command fails, user should be prompted (see r823: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ecryptfs/ecryptfs/trunk/revision/823). I think user should be prompted that the file may not be decrypted successfully though user can mount it to /tmp/ecryptfs.XXXXXX because the manner of recovery is like that of "sudo mount -t ecryptfs <secure> <raw>" command, that is to say, we can mount with different passphrases but only the right passphrase can decrypt files. I am here reopening the bug report about ecryptfs-recover-private command(see bug 1028532).That patch written by Dustin has fixed the issue that if mount command fails, user should be prompted (see r823: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ecryptfs/ecryptfs/trunk/revision/823). I think user should be prompted that the file may not be decrypted successfully though user can mount it to /tmp/ecryptfs.XXXXXX because the manner of recovery is like that of "sudo mount -t ecryptfs <secure> <raw>" command, that is to say, we can mount with different passphrases but only the right passphrase can decrypt files.
2017-06-08 19:49:48 Jason Xing branch linked lp:~wlxing/ecryptfs/lp1694272
2017-06-08 23:32:34 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ecryptfs
2017-06-08 23:33:55 Tyler Hicks ecryptfs: status New Fix Committed