[Feature Request] support xz for compressing volumes
Bug #629357 reported by
Rob Fortune
This bug affects 14 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duplicity |
New
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
duplicity (Ubuntu) |
Opinion
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
xz offers a superior compression ratio at the cost of higher CPU load during creation of backup, but still decompresses (when you need it most) at a rapid pace. I don't know if it should be the default but adding it as an option could save yottabytes of bandwidth :)
Related branches
Changed in duplicity (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in duplicity: | |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
Changed in duplicity (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Opinion |
Changed in duplicity: | |
status: | New → Opinion |
importance: | Wishlist → Undecided |
Changed in duplicity: | |
status: | Opinion → New |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
To post a comment you must log in.
I have been in discussion with the authors of xz and because of the way it works there is no ideal settings for compression. Simply throwing -1 or -9 at it like bzip2/gzip is wrong.
They attest the best compression value would be -6e because it only requires 9MB of ram to decompress and you don't lose a lot of compression.