Yes but the point is one is a clone of the other without composite
support
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 18:16 +0000, Andrea Cimitan wrote:
> 2009/2/11 David Siegel <email address hidden>:
> > Can you please give a rationale? I am using the Classic theme right now
> > on my composited screen.
> >
>
>
> Do.Interface.Linux/src/Do.Interface/ClassicInterface/ClassicWindow.cs
>
> They have the same name :(
>
the Do.Interface.Linux/src/Do.Interface/ClassicInterface/ClassicWindow.cs theme has a different gradient/highlight and supports compositing (it draws a rounded frame when the screen is composited).
We should remove the compositing support from it? Or keep both?
Hi,
I bought a TV last week from a website:www.hkeles.com. I have
received the product. The quality is very good. They also sell
phones,motor,psp and so on. Because of the financial crisis, their
products are very cheap. by the way, they only sell new and original
products .If you need these products, you can have a look . I think
you will get many benefits.
Greetings!
Allowing manual selection of a theme which doesn't use compositing would be beneficial to individuals who sometimes use screen magnifiers which don't support compositing properly with a window manager like Compiz
So these users sometimes use a compositing manager, and sometimes do not use a compositing manager? And that the goal is to have a consistent theme in both cases?
Can you please give a rationale? I am using the Classic theme right now on my composited screen.