Allow custom worker count on sidekiq
Bug #1830894 reported by
Benjamin Allot
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discourse Charm |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Hello,
Following a memory shortage on a discourse unit, I found out that sidekiq was the culprit.
The upstream bug is referenced here: https:/
There isn't a clear winner for the bug resolution among:
* the worker count reduction
* the switch to jemalloc
* the upgrade of sidekiq/ruby
I propose that this bug addresses the first one, which is yet another option to possibly customize the
systemd unit rendered for sidekiq.service
Let me know if you need more details.
Regards,
To post a comment you must log in.