Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck

Bug #1033879 reported by MC Return
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Compiz
Fix Released
Medium
MC Return
0.9.8
Fix Released
Medium
MC Return
compiz (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Medium
MC Return
Quantal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Test Case]

No obvious test case, just making sure that a memory leak in this place does not happen any more (valgrind mayhaps?)

[Regression Potential]

No regression potential.

Original description:

gtk/window-decorator/decorator.c:1016]: (error) Memory leak: opts

Related branches

MC Return (mc-return)
Changed in compiz:
assignee: nobody → MC Return (mc-return)
Changed in compiz:
status: New → In Progress
milestone: none → 0.9.9.0
MC Return (mc-return)
summary: - Memory leaks reported by cppcheck
+ Memory leak in decorator reported by cppcheck
description: updated
Changed in compiz:
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in compiz:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → MC Return (mc-return)
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) wrote :

Fix committed into lp:compiz at revision 3460, scheduled for release in Compiz 0.9.9.0
Fix committed into lp:compiz/0.9.8 at revision 3417, scheduled for release in Compiz 0.9.8.8

Changed in compiz:
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello MC, or anyone else affected,

Accepted compiz into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/1:0.9.8.6+bzr3433-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Changed in compiz (Ubuntu Quantal):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton) wrote : [compiz/quantal] verification still needed

The fix for this bug has been awaiting testing feedback in the -proposed repository for quantal for more than 90 days. Please test this fix and update the bug appropriately with the results. In the event that the fix for this bug is still not verified 15 days from now, the package will be removed from the -proposed repository.

tags: added: removal-candidate
Revision history for this message
Stephen M. Webb (bregma) wrote :

marking as closed (0.9.8 series is obsolete)

Changed in compiz (Ubuntu Quantal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Mathew Hodson (mhodson)
tags: added: verification-failed
removed: verification-needed
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.