OpenStack Manila Charm

Manila Share Service failed to start. Config opt 'driver_handles_share_servers' has improper value - 'None'

  1. Series 2023.1
  2. Bug #2012457
Bug #2012457 reported by Dominik Bender
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
OpenStack Manila Charm
Fix Committed
High
Alex Kavanagh
2023.1
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
Yoga
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
Zed
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

After fresh deployment of cephfs, manila and manila-genesha on jammy/zed stable all charms comes up active whitout error messages.

But on manila units the manila-share.service failed to start with log entry:

---
CRITICAL manila [None req-b1d84846-ce2e-4dff-bb67-26268a000305 - - - - - -] Unhandled error: manila.exception.ManilaException: Config opt 'driver_handles_share_servers' has improper value - 'None'. Please define it as boolean.
---

I tried "juju config manila config-flags="driver_handles_share_servers=false" but without luck.

---
× manila-share.service - OpenStack Manila Share
     Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/manila-share.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
     Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2023-03-22 03:49:52 UTC; 11min ago
       Docs: man:manila-share(1)
   Main PID: 88685 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
        CPU: 1.479s

Mar 22 03:49:52 juju-b9f7b8-2-lxd-25 systemd[1]: manila-share.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter is at 5.
Mar 22 03:49:52 juju-b9f7b8-2-lxd-25 systemd[1]: Stopped OpenStack Manila Share.
Mar 22 03:49:52 juju-b9f7b8-2-lxd-25 systemd[1]: manila-share.service: Consumed 1.479s CPU time.
Mar 22 03:49:52 juju-b9f7b8-2-lxd-25 systemd[1]: manila-share.service: Start request repeated too quickly.
Mar 22 03:49:52 juju-b9f7b8-2-lxd-25 systemd[1]: manila-share.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Mar 22 03:49:52 juju-b9f7b8-2-lxd-25 systemd[1]: Failed to start OpenStack Manila Share.
---

---
Controller/Model Version: 2.9.42
Series: jammy
Openstack-Origin/Source: cloud:jammy-zed

App Version Status Scale Charm Channel Rev Exposed Message
manila 15.1.0 active 3 manila zed/stable 92 no Unit is ready
manila-hacluster active 3 hacluster 2.4/stable 117 no Unit is ready and clustered
manila-mysql-router 8.0.32 active 3 mysql-router 8.0/stable 35 no Unit is ready

Unit Workload Agent Machine Public address Ports Message
manila/6* active idle 0/lxd/25 10.104.121.34 8786/tcp Unit is ready
  manila-hacluster/7* active idle 10.104.121.34 Unit is ready and clustered
  manila-mysql-router/7 active idle 10.104.121.34 Unit is ready
manila/7 active idle 1/lxd/27 10.104.121.43 8786/tcp Unit is ready
  manila-hacluster/8 active idle 10.104.121.43 Unit is ready and clustered
  manila-mysql-router/8* active idle 10.104.121.43 Unit is ready
manila/8 active idle 2/lxd/25 10.104.121.35 8786/tcp Unit is ready
  manila-hacluster/6 active idle 10.104.121.35 Unit is ready and clustered
  manila-mysql-router/6 active idle 10.104.121.35 Unit is ready
---

See original description
Revision history for this message
Dominik Bender (ephermeral) wrote :
Dominik Bender (ephermeral)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Nobuto Murata (nobuto) wrote :

I wonder if you executed the post deployment steps or not described in the charm guide:
https://docs.openstack.org/charm-guide/latest/admin/storage/shared-filesystem-services.html#configuration

Revision history for this message
Dominik Bender (ephermeral) wrote :
Download full text (6.3 KiB)

My post deployment steps:

manila type-create nfs-sc1 false
manila type-key nfs-sc1 set share_backend_name=CEPHFSNFS1 storage_protocol=NFS
manila create --share-type nfs-sc1 --name sc1-test nfs 1

+---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Property | Value |
 +---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| id | cae8e1be-ea67-4df9-b7b2-ce74e59983e6 |
| size | 1 |
| availability_zone | None |
| created_at | 2023-03-22T02:56:58.586046 |
| status | creating |
| name | sc1-test |
| description | None |
| project_id | ec101c020cd94de3bdc7ef514021e0e2 |
| snapshot_id | None |
| share_network_id | None |
| share_proto | NFS |
| metadata | {} |
| share_type | 37d4c44a-4b17-4dd6-ab0e-f8f3691c3c25 |
| is_public | False |
| snapshot_support | False |
| task_state | None |
| share_type_name | nfs-sc1 |
| access_rules_status | active |
| replication_type | None |
| has_replicas | False |
| user_id | a6c7ceede9af466089380c141428d439 |
| create_share_from_snapshot_support | False |
| revert_to_snapshot_support | False |
| share_group_id | None |
| source_share_group_snapshot_member_id | None |
| mount_snapshot_support | False |
| progress | None |
| is_soft_deleted | False |
| scheduled_to_be_deleted_at | None |
| share_server_id | None |
| host | |
 +---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+

after some minutes:

+---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Property | Value ...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Dominik Bender (ephermeral) wrote :
Alex Kavanagh (ajkavanagh)
Changed in charm-manila:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → High
assignee: nobody → Alex Kavanagh (ajkavanagh)
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to charm-manila (master)

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896643

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to charm-manila (master)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896643
Committed: https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-manila/commit/d0ad23950ffbbc87c176c008cd0180a0d579ddcd
Submitter: "Zuul (22348)"
Branch: master

commit d0ad23950ffbbc87c176c008cd0180a0d579ddcd
Author: Alex Kavanagh <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 18 15:01:41 2023 +0100

    Fix local/remote assumptions in manila charm

    When the remote plugin was developed it made the assumption that the
    `enabled_share_backends` included the remote backends. This assumption
    is wrong, and it should only contain the locally defined drivers; i.e.
    ones that have a [driver] section in the manila.conf file. The cephfsnfs
    driver doesn't have a local configuration as the share-server is runs on
    the manila-ganesha unit and so shouldn't be local.

    This patch splits the config in local/remote and then uses the local and
    remote config in the correct places.

    Closes-Bug: #2012457
    Change-Id: I436452208aaeaf08d1655da4fccbd7a89549b404

Changed in charm-manila:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to charm-manila (stable/2023.1)

Fix proposed to branch: stable/2023.1
Review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896854

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to charm-manila (stable/zed)

Fix proposed to branch: stable/zed
Review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896855

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to charm-manila (stable/yoga)

Fix proposed to branch: stable/yoga
Review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896856

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to charm-manila (stable/2023.1)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896854
Committed: https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-manila/commit/6ec78dd3dbfbe0963a3f11f58562966ddb8248a9
Submitter: "Zuul (22348)"
Branch: stable/2023.1

commit 6ec78dd3dbfbe0963a3f11f58562966ddb8248a9
Author: Alex Kavanagh <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 18 15:01:41 2023 +0100

    Fix local/remote assumptions in manila charm

    When the remote plugin was developed it made the assumption that the
    `enabled_share_backends` included the remote backends. This assumption
    is wrong, and it should only contain the locally defined drivers; i.e.
    ones that have a [driver] section in the manila.conf file. The cephfsnfs
    driver doesn't have a local configuration as the share-server is runs on
    the manila-ganesha unit and so shouldn't be local.

    This patch splits the config in local/remote and then uses the local and
    remote config in the correct places.

    Closes-Bug: #2012457
    Change-Id: I436452208aaeaf08d1655da4fccbd7a89549b404
    (cherry picked from commit d0ad23950ffbbc87c176c008cd0180a0d579ddcd)

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to charm-manila (stable/zed)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896855
Committed: https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-manila/commit/5cc75e1ff6936eb960ba8ad297091a5f8cfd5a69
Submitter: "Zuul (22348)"
Branch: stable/zed

commit 5cc75e1ff6936eb960ba8ad297091a5f8cfd5a69
Author: Alex Kavanagh <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 18 15:01:41 2023 +0100

    Fix local/remote assumptions in manila charm

    When the remote plugin was developed it made the assumption that the
    `enabled_share_backends` included the remote backends. This assumption
    is wrong, and it should only contain the locally defined drivers; i.e.
    ones that have a [driver] section in the manila.conf file. The cephfsnfs
    driver doesn't have a local configuration as the share-server is runs on
    the manila-ganesha unit and so shouldn't be local.

    This patch splits the config in local/remote and then uses the local and
    remote config in the correct places.

    Closes-Bug: #2012457
    Change-Id: I436452208aaeaf08d1655da4fccbd7a89549b404
    (cherry picked from commit d0ad23950ffbbc87c176c008cd0180a0d579ddcd)

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to charm-manila (stable/yoga)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila/+/896856
Committed: https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-manila/commit/a752d596a0c5fb43b193d9a337d7082e74097e00
Submitter: "Zuul (22348)"
Branch: stable/yoga

commit a752d596a0c5fb43b193d9a337d7082e74097e00
Author: Alex Kavanagh <email address hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 18 15:01:41 2023 +0100

    Fix local/remote assumptions in manila charm

    When the remote plugin was developed it made the assumption that the
    `enabled_share_backends` included the remote backends. This assumption
    is wrong, and it should only contain the locally defined drivers; i.e.
    ones that have a [driver] section in the manila.conf file. The cephfsnfs
    driver doesn't have a local configuration as the share-server is runs on
    the manila-ganesha unit and so shouldn't be local.

    This patch splits the config in local/remote and then uses the local and
    remote config in the correct places.

    Closes-Bug: #2012457
    Change-Id: I436452208aaeaf08d1655da4fccbd7a89549b404
    (cherry picked from commit d0ad23950ffbbc87c176c008cd0180a0d579ddcd)

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.