juju remove-unit ceph-osd/5 breaks
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ceph OSD Charm |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
| Charm Helpers |
Fix Committed
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Running the command in the subject resulted at secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:39 INFO juju-log secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 DEBUG secrets-
2020-03-19 16:05:41 ERROR juju.worker.
The workaround I used was to make token = last_token (with juju run ... relation-set )
and then it passed the failing line: File "/var/lib/
But I believe the issue is that it removes first the relation to vault and then tries to fetch a secret_id with an invalidated token key.
| Changed in charm-helpers: | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| Changed in charm-ceph-osd: | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| Changed in charm-helpers: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| Changed in charm-ceph-osd: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Medium |
| tags: | added: scaleback |
| Changed in charm-helpers: | |
| status: | Triaged → Fix Committed |
| OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote Fix merged to charm-ceph-osd (master) | #1 |
| Changed in charm-ceph-osd: | |
| status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
| Changed in charm-ceph-osd: | |
| milestone: | none → 20.05 |
| Changed in charm-ceph-osd: | |
| status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Reviewed: https:/
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: master
commit 0ecc33223cdc6a7
Author: Chris MacNaughton <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Apr 1 12:56:11 2020 +0200
Be more defensive when checking Vault
When relations are departing during a unit removal, the relation
to Vault can loose enough data that the vault-relation-
raises an exception. The checks for Vault readiness should be more
defensive to ensure that charms can successfully depart their relations
Depends-On https:/
Closes-Bug: #1868282
Change-Id: I0b6226f0f3500a