Activity log for bug #818206
Date | Who | What changed | Old value | New value | Message |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011-07-29 19:06:47 | Jelmer Vernooij | bug | added bug | ||
2011-08-01 00:32:09 | Martin Pool | tags | confusing-ui stacking ui | ||
2011-08-05 14:33:26 | John A Meinel | bzr: status | New | Won't Fix | |
2011-08-11 05:31:51 | Martin Pool | description | A user was complaining in #bzr today that various bzr commands would download a large part of his history. This turned out to be because of --stacked, which was apparently recommended to him by somebody. As --stacked by default does not really have much use, should we perhaps hide it or at least make it warn when used together without --no-tree ? | A user was complaining in #bzr today that various bzr commands would download a large part of his history. This turned out to be because of --stacked, which was apparently recommended to him by somebody. Possibly there should be something to prevent/warn/discourage people using --stacked on a remote location. | |
2011-08-11 05:32:09 | Martin Pool | summary | hide --stacked option to "bzr branch" ? | stacking on a remote branch is a bad idea | |
2011-08-11 05:32:24 | Martin Pool | summary | stacking on a remote branch is a bad idea | stacking on a remote branch is slow; perhaps should warn | |
2011-08-11 05:32:27 | Martin Pool | bzr: status | Won't Fix | Confirmed | |
2011-08-11 05:32:28 | Martin Pool | bzr: importance | Undecided | Low | |
2011-12-17 01:21:45 | Jelmer Vernooij | marked as duplicate | 791704 |