This is intentional behaviour. In format 0.4, you have to specify the name of tree explicitly if you'd like to get the version from one of the nested trees.
e.g. {debversion:packaging} rather than {debversion}.
IIRC the reason for this is so that bzr-builder can determine the version string without having to build the full tree.
This is intentional behaviour. In format 0.4, you have to specify the name of tree explicitly if you'd like to get the version from one of the nested trees.
e.g. {debversion: packaging} rather than {debversion}.
IIRC the reason for this is so that bzr-builder can determine the version string without having to build the full tree.