TTPAC unused image cleanup
Bug #956023 reported by
Michael Peters
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Won't Fix
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
2.3 |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
There are a significant number of images remaining in TTPAC that are no longer used, leftover from KCLS, etc.
This branch does a little cleanup on the image directory and nets us about a 200KB savings overall.
tags: | added: pullrequest |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | none → 2.2.0beta1 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 2.2.0beta1 → 2.2.0rc1 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 2.2.0rc1 → 2.2.0 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 2.2.0 → 2.2.1 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
milestone: | 2.2.1 → 2.2.2 |
Changed in evergreen: | |
status: | Confirmed → Won't Fix |
To post a comment you must log in.
Michael, did you also scan the CSS files for images in use? I quick grep shows a few of the removed images may be in use in /web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css as background images.
My quick list:
Open-ILS/ web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css: background: url('/images/ banner- bg.png' ) no-repeat; web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css: background: url('/images/ button- bg.png' ) no-repeat; web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css: background: url('/images/ dropdown- hover.gif' ) no-repeat right center; web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css: background: url('/images/ dropdown. gif') no-repeat right center; web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css: background: url('/images/ facet_box_ bg_bottom. png') no-repeat; web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css: background: url('/images/ hp-links- mid.jpg' ) repeat-x; web/css/ skin/default/ opac/style. css: background: url('/images/ utils-corner- left.png' ) no-repeat left top; web/css/ skin/default/ opac/semiauto. css:.left- corner { float: left; width: 163px; height: 30px; background: url('/images/ utils-corner- mid.png' ) repeat-x top; }
Open-ILS/
Open-ILS/
Open-ILS/
Open-ILS/
Open-ILS/
Open-ILS/
Open-ILS/
I didn't check whether we are actually using the CSS classes in question, though. Can you confirm either way?