Overlay scrollbars aren't present // no gtk3 version

Bug #753391 reported by Joaquin
94
This bug affects 18 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: chromium-browser

No GTK3 version and no overlay scrollbars support

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: chromium-browser 11.0.696.34~r80286-0ubuntu1~ucd~beta1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic-pae 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
CrashDB: ubuntu
Date: Thu Apr 7 12:44:01 2011
InstallationMedia: elementary
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=es_ES:en
 LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: chromium-browser
ThirdParty: True
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-01 (36 days ago)
chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=""

Revision history for this message
Joaquin (jknvv13) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Elliot Glaysher (glaysher) wrote :

Realistically, GTK3 isn't happening in chrome until GTK3 is in an LTS version of Ubuntu, is common in other distributions, and a certain proprietary browser plugin vendor has ported their very popular plugin to GTK3 (because otherwise we'd have a process trying to link with both versions of GTK).

Realistically, any native widgets in the web content area aren't happening: http://dev.chromium.org/developers/linux-technical-faq

Revision history for this message
Joaquin (jknvv13) wrote : Re: [Bug 753391] Re: Overlay scrollbars aren't present // no gtk3 version

Well, Konqueror uses Qt/KDE and can run GTK2 plugins, like flash.

2011/5/9 Elliot Glaysher <email address hidden>

> Realistically, GTK3 isn't happening in chrome until GTK3 is in an LTS
> version of Ubuntu, is common in other distributions, and a certain
> proprietary browser plugin vendor has ported their very popular plugin
> to GTK3 (because otherwise we'd have a process trying to link with both
> versions of GTK).
>
> Realistically, any native widgets in the web content area aren't
> happening: http://dev.chromium.org/developers/linux-technical-faq
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753391
>
> Title:
> Overlay scrollbars aren't present // no gtk3 version
>
> Status in “chromium-browser” package in Ubuntu:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: chromium-browser
>
> No GTK3 version and no overlay scrollbars support
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
> Package: chromium-browser 11.0.696.34~r80286-0ubuntu1~ucd~beta1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic-pae 2.6.38.2
> Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Architecture: i386
> CrashDB: ubuntu
> Date: Thu Apr 7 12:44:01 2011
> InstallationMedia: elementary
> ProcEnviron:
> LANGUAGE=es_ES:en
> LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: chromium-browser
> ThirdParty: True
> UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-01 (36 days ago)
> chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=""
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/753391/+subscribe
>

Revision history for this message
Elliot Glaysher (glaysher) wrote :

Konqueror/Qt doesn't define symbols with the same names as functions in GTK2. The problem is that the majority of functions in gtk2 and gtk3 have the same symbol names.

If Qt defined (for example) gtk_widget_show(), there'd be conflicts and I'm pretty sure Konqueror wouldn't be able to run gtk2 plugins.

Revision history for this message
Joaquin (jknvv13) wrote :

It does.
El 10/05/2011 02:36, "Elliot Glaysher" <email address hidden> escribió:
> Konqueror/Qt doesn't define symbols with the same names as functions in
> GTK2. The problem is that the majority of functions in gtk2 and gtk3
> have the same symbol names.
>
> If Qt defined (for example) gtk_widget_show(), there'd be conflicts and
> I'm pretty sure Konqueror wouldn't be able to run gtk2 plugins.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753391
>
> Title:
> Overlay scrollbars aren't present // no gtk3 version
>
> Status in “chromium-browser” package in Ubuntu:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: chromium-browser
>
> No GTK3 version and no overlay scrollbars support
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
> Package: chromium-browser 11.0.696.34~r80286-0ubuntu1~ucd~beta1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic-pae 2.6.38.2
> Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Architecture: i386
> CrashDB: ubuntu
> Date: Thu Apr 7 12:44:01 2011
> InstallationMedia: elementary
> ProcEnviron:
> LANGUAGE=es_ES:en
> LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: chromium-browser
> ThirdParty: True
> UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-01 (36 days ago)
> chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=""
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
>
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/753391/+subscribe

Revision history for this message
Ahmad Syukri Abdollah (syockit) wrote :

Can you give an example of symbol conflict in QT+GTK2 in Konqueror? Seeing that almost all symbols in QT start with q, and GTK start with g or gtk/gdk, I can't think of how the symbols could conflict. Meanwhile you could say almost all symbols in GTK2 would conflict with GTK3 (they are not prefixed with numbers i.e. GTK2 or GTK3, only GTK). (Not to mention QT is in C++, uses namespace. By the way, the namespaces in gtkmm version 3 is still the same as its predecessor)

Changed in chromium-browser (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Adolfo Jayme Barrientos (fitojb) wrote :

This bug report is more a rant than a proper bug report.

For details about GTK+2 use in Chromium, see http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=79722.

And... one issue per report, please. Ayatana scrollbars and GTK+ issues are unrelated.

Changed in chromium-browser (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Joaquin (jknvv13) wrote :

Chromium doesn't use GTK scrollbars. That's the bug.
El 01/10/2011 13:22, "Fitoschido" <email address hidden> escribió:

> This bug report is more a rant than a proper bug report.
>
> For details about GTK+2 use in Chromium, see
> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=79722.
>
> And... one issue per report, please. Ayatana scrollbars and GTK+ issues
> are unrelated.
>
> ** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/chromium/issues #79722
> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=79722
>
> ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
> Status: Confirmed => Invalid
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753391
>
> Title:
> Overlay scrollbars aren't present // no gtk3 version
>
> Status in “chromium-browser” package in Ubuntu:
> Invalid
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: chromium-browser
>
> No GTK3 version and no overlay scrollbars support
>
> ProblemType: Bug
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
> Package: chromium-browser 11.0.696.34~r80286-0ubuntu1~ucd~beta1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.41-generic-pae 2.6.38.2
> Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686
> NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
> Architecture: i386
> CrashDB: ubuntu
> Date: Thu Apr 7 12:44:01 2011
> InstallationMedia: elementary
> ProcEnviron:
> LANGUAGE=es_ES:en
> LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackage: chromium-browser
> ThirdParty: True
> UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-01 (36 days ago)
> chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=""
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/753391/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Daniel Wiberg (dannew) wrote :

Should there be a new bug registered for Chromium not using Ayatana scrollbars then?

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Related questions

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.