[saydo] saydo matches too leniently, causing errors

2009-12-21 21:26:23,261 DEBUG source.atrum: Received message from Vhata in Spinach: do you care for sodomy?
2009-12-21 21:26:23,261 DEBUG core.dispatcher: Received event from atrum source
2009-12-21 21:26:23,269 DEBUG core.auth: Checking saydo permission for 1/1 (Vhata!<email address hidden>) from cache: auth
2009-12-21 21:26:23,612 DEBUG source.atrum: Authentication result for Vhata: True
2009-12-21 21:26:23,677 INFO core.auth: Authenticated 1/1 (Vhata!<email address hidden>) using nickserv
2009-12-21 21:26:23,701 ERROR core.dispatcher: Exception occured in Log processor of log plugin.
Event: {'account': 1L, 'responses': [{'action': True, 'reply': u'care for sodomy?', 'address': False, 'target': u'you', 'source': None}], 'source': u'atrum', 'addressed': True, 'session': <sqlalchemy.orm.session.Sess object at 0xb788f3ac>, 'processed': True, 'time': dat
etime.datetime(2009, 12, 21, 19, 26, 23, 262508), 'identity': 1L, 'message': {'raw': u'do you care for sodomy?', 'deaddressed': u'do you care for sodomy?', 'clean': u'do you care for sodomy', 'stripped': u'do you care for sodomy'}, 'type': u'message', 'public': False, '
channel': u'Vhata!<email address hidden>', 'sender': {'nick': u'Vhata', 'connection': u'Vhata!<email address hidden>', 'id': u'Vhata'}}
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/spinach/ibid/ibid/core.py", line 26, in _process
    processor.process(event)
  File "/home/spinach/ibid/ibid/plugins/log.py", line 130, in process
    self.log_event(e) File "/home/spinach/ibid/ibid/plugins/log.py", line 105, in log_event file = self.get_logfile(event)
  File "/home/spinach/ibid/ibid/plugins/log.py", line 49, in get_logfile
    channel = ibid.sources[event.source].logging_name(event.channel)
  File "/home/spinach/ibid/ibid/__init__.py", line 17, in __getitem__
    return dict.__getitem__(self, key.lower())
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'lower'
2009-12-21 21:26:23,701 DEBUG core.dispatcher: {'account': 1L, 'responses': [{'action': True, 'reply': u'care for sodomy?', 'address': False, 'target': u'you', 'source': None}], 'complain': u'exception', 'source': u'atrum', 'addressed': True, 'processed': True, 'time':
datetime.datetime(2009, 12, 21, 19, 26, 23, 262508), 'identity': 1L, 'message': {'raw': u'do you care for sodomy?', 'deaddressed': u'do you care for sodomy?', 'clean': u'do you care for sodomy', 'stripped': u'do you care for sodomy'}, 'type': u'message', 'public': False, 'channel': u'Vhata!<email address hidden>', 'sender': {'nick': u'Vhata', 'connection': u'Vhata!<email address hidden>', 'id': u'Vhata'}}

"do you care for sodomy?" appears to be being interpreted as "do [in] you [on source None] care for sodomy?"

Adminny commands like saydo don't need to be as lenient matching: they can require strict syntax so they don't get in the way of normal stuff.