Budget report shows an inverted Decay (screenshot Attached)

Hello,

In fact you are right and wrong for this bug.
Right in the way that there is a bug. Wrong about what the bug is.
I explain with your example:

5/10 - battery -189.60
5/10 - Sanborns -100
5/10 - Bershka -500
5/25 - Venta Inspiron +5270
the balance for these 4 transaction is +4480.4

BUT with a budget perspective, the decay is +5480.40.
The budget for the leisure category is -1000, so it is an expense. That represent the 0 for this category and so:
the decay between -1000 to 4480.4 is 5480.40.

So the bug was in my decay computing formula, originally: decay = ABS(budget) - ABS(spent);
I fixed this to:
decay = budget - spent;
and then if budget is an expense, decay should be inverted sign.

I join a screenshot with some king a unit test.

In fact this buf was fixed for v4.0.4.
But I forgot to mention it into the Changelog.
Can you give me a feedback about the fix ?

Hello, I report that the bug persists in my budget report on HomeBank-4.0.4. In fact, choosing to only see incomes in the report yields no results. Can somebody reproduce?

By the way, HomeBank is great. Thanks for this fine piece of software; keep up the work.

I will make some test again

There was 2 problems I have fixed:
1) the income filter was not showing anything.
2) the formula was not correct, the correct one is decay = spent - budget.
Please not well that budget must be negative for expected expense et positive for expected income for a defined category.

Fixed for v4.1

Yes, but my spent values are negative, so I get....
-ve spent minus +ve budget = very -ve Decay.

This is frustrating... should we not be working with positive values for spent and budget???

Please see the attached screenshot.

Thanks.

Lu