OpenStack Swift Proxy Charm

swift-proxy charm uses old keystonemiddleware config

Bug #1960866 reported by Corey Bryant on 2022-02-14

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	OpenStack Swift Proxy Charm	Fix Committed	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

ubuntu@juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4:~$ systemctl status swift-proxy
● swift-proxy.service - OpenStack Swift proxy server
     Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/swift-proxy.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
     Active: active (running) since Mon 2022-02-14 21:19:06 UTC; 32min ago
       Docs: man:swift-proxy-server(1)
   Main PID: 23229 (swift-proxy-ser)
      Tasks: 3 (limit: 2339)
     Memory: 99.8M
     CGroup: /system.slice/swift-proxy.service
             ├─23229 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf
             ├─23375 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf
             └─23423 /usr/bin/python3 /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf

Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "auth_url" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "username" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "password" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "project_domain_name" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "user_domain_name" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "project_name" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "signing_dir" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: STDERR: The option "__name__" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23423]: AuthToken middleware is set with keystone_authtoken.service_token_roles_required set to False. This is backwards compatible but deprecated behaviour. Please set this to True.
Feb 14 21:19:07 juju-2b302b-zaza-8d2bffc075ea-4 swift[23229]: Started child 23423 from parent 23229

I only looked for release notes on one of these, signing_dir:

https://opendev.org/openstack/keystonemiddleware/src/branch/master/releasenotes/notes/bug-1649735-3c68f3243e474775.yaml

We probably need a new proxy-server.conf template for newer releases and determine if we need to replace these old options with different ones.

Tags:

Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) on 2022-02-15

tags:

added: good-first-bug

Revision history for this message

JamesLin (jneo8) wrote on 2022-04-20:

The full output is

Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "bind_port" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "workers" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "user" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "bind_ip" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "log_name" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "log_facility" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "log_level" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "log_address" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "log_headers" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "auth_url" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "username" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "password" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "project_domain_name" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "user_domain_name" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "project_name" is not known to keystonemiddleware
Apr 20 06:02:19 juju-f418a1-dev-9 swift[31943]: STDERR: The option "__name__" is not known to keystonemiddleware

And the line in https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-swift-proxy/src/commit/5f38205d3f84bd6b009dc500ff0a89d136beada0/charmhelpers/contrib/openstack/context.py#L478

which keep all variable in ctxt, cause this STDERR.

Maybe we need to fix the code how we construct the IdentityServiceContext?

The full output is

And the line in https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-swift-proxy/src/commit/5f38205d3f84bd6b009dc500ff0a89d136beada0/charmhelpers/contrib/openstack/context.py#L478

which keep all variable in ctxt, cause this STDERR.

Maybe we need to fix the code how we construct the IdentityServiceContext?

Revision history for this message

JamesLin (jneo8) wrote on 2022-04-20:

Update:

The charm is not actually using charm-helpers to generate the `SwiftIdentityContext`

https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-swift-proxy/src/commit/5f38205d3f84bd6b009dc500ff0a89d136beada0/lib/swift_context.py#L163

So the context like `bind_port` will be used to generate the conf files: https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-swift-proxy/src/commit/5f38205d3f84bd6b009dc500ff0a89d136beada0/lib/swift_utils.py#L169

Revision history for this message

OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote on 2022-04-21: Fix proposed to charm-swift-proxy (master)

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-swift-proxy/+/838824

Changed in charm-swift-proxy:
status:	New → In Progress

Revision history for this message

JamesLin (jneo8) wrote on 2022-04-21:

Also see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1920109

Revision history for this message

OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote on 2022-04-25: Fix merged to charm-swift-proxy (master)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-swift-proxy/+/838824
Committed: https://opendev.org/openstack/charm-swift-proxy/commit/daef40a83702593cce4d97c7fe2f7c4656c342e1
Submitter: "Zuul (22348)"
Branch: master

commit daef40a83702593cce4d97c7fe2f7c4656c342e1
Author: jneo8 <email address hidden>
Date: Thu Apr 21 14:31:33 2022 +0800

Add new version template: yoga

Closes-Bug: #1960866
Change-Id: I90769c16ca05c725c212255da5cb04a5e36bdcda

Changed in charm-swift-proxy:
status:	In Progress → Fix Committed

Report a bug

This report contains Public information

Everyone can see this information.

You are

Subscribing...

Edit bug mail

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.